Wars
By Conrado de Quiros
By Conrado de Quiros
The
ironies in the war between Juan Ponce Enrile and Antonio Trillanes
are so rich and plentiful I don’t know where to begin to appreciate
them. They are, in no particular order of importance, these:
One,
that Trillanes should accuse Enrile of being the tuta of Gloria
Macapagal-Arroyo on the eve of the 40th anniversary of martial law.
The context of it of course is the division of Camarines Sur. Enrile
says he isn’t even aware that Arroyo is interested in CamSur, which
is about as true as saying he’s not aware his son is running for
senator.
But
surely if you want to accuse Enrile of being tuta at this
time there’s someone to point to more readily as his master? Before
Enrile reinvented himself as the country’s savior from martial law,
he was an architect of martial law. In fact, he triggered it by
faking an ambush on himself in Wack Wack, which was what Ferdinand
Marcos specifically cited to declare it. He would admit his sin after
Edsa, but recant it after he had a falling out with Cory. And he
calls Trillanes a liar.
Two,
that Trillanes should be P-Noy’s backdoor diplomat to China. P-Noy
explains that the initiative came from Trillanes himself—Trillanes
was approached by Chinese officials while he was in China. But you
still have to wonder why P-Noy thought it a good idea.
At
the very least Trillanes’ ability to read a situation well you see
in the Oakwood mutiny. At the time he mounted it, Arroyo was a
legitimate president, made so by an act of People Power. At the time
he mounted it, elections were round the corner, which was the
perfectly legitimate way to get rid of her. At the time he mounted
it, the public couldn’t care less about his cause he hadn’t
bothered to inform them of it. It was as though Trillanes believed
that by the sheer force of his personality, he would rally the nation
around him spontaneously. In fact, all it showed was someone who was
impulsive and reckless, if not indeed egotistical and deluded.
At
the very most, why Trillanes and not any one of the China experts, or
those who have actually lived in China, worked in China, and spent a
lifetime studying China? Such as Chito Sta.
Romana,
Jimmy Florcruz, and Ericson Baculinao? They not only know China very
well, they are friends with some members of the Chinese politburo.
And their patriotism is beyond question. If P-Noy cannot turn them
into backdoor negotiators, two of them being journalists working for
international news agencies, he can at least rely on their expertise.
Whom does Trillanes know that can affect Chinese policy?
Three,
that Trillanes should announce he is the backdoor diplomat to China.
The point of doing things backdoor is secrecy. Trillanes’ lips are
about as sealed as Maurice Arcache’s. It was not Enrile who first
revealed Trillanes’ dealings with China, it was Trillanes himself
in response to Foreign Secretary Albert del Rosario’s apparent
provocations. And the point of diplomacy is to keep a united front.
You have differences with the official stand, thresh it out first.
But you do not carry out an official function with a different
agenda. You speak with one voice.
You
see the importance of that in the way Mitt Romney tried to politicize
the anti-American riots in Libya and elsewhere, saying Barack Obama
was supporting the rioters more than America. The humongous backlash
against him from friend and foe alike has probably cost him the
elections. The point is simple: Foreign policy may not be held
hostage to partisan politics. You’ve got differences in how to face
the world, resolve it internally. But at the end of the day, you take
one stand, you speak with one voice.
Four,
Enrile says the danger of Trillanes getting reelected is that “China
might have a senator in this chamber.” Well, if Trillanes is a
Chinese agent, he hasn’t learned very much from Mao who proposed
that creating too many enemies at the same time is suicidal, you
should take them one at a time. Trillanes has just managed to piss
off Enrile, Del Rosario and Manny Pangilinan. The last he accused of
being hostile to China for his own interests and who in turn has
called him a barefaced liar. Which is also what Enrile and Erap call
him. He has also just managed to piss off Malacañang. Little wonder
he keeps losing his wars.
But
what’s this, we should worry about having a Chinese agent—by
Enrile’s definition—in the Senate but not worry about having
American agents in it? Who are most of the senators? Indeed, at the
very heart of Foreign Affairs? Who are Del Rosario and company?
In
the end, what’s so wrong about Trillanes’ conduct is that he
himself subverts his own disagreements with Del Rosario’s
confrontational approach to China. Or his antics make people forget
about them. You don’t have to be a Chinese sympathizer, or agent,
to see that Del Rosario has been dangerously saber-rattling with
China—a “war freak” as Trillanes calls him—while dragging the
United States into the fray on the insane assumption it will take our
side in any open confrontation with China. “Hu’s your daddy?”
Barbara Bachman asks Americans, in reference to China owning the
biggest amount of US dollars outside the United States. Alas,
Trillanes cannot now be the best advancer of these criticisms.
Finally,
China must be laughing its head off. I used to say it doesn’t need
to attack us, all it has to do is get its more than 1 billion
citizens to piss into the China Sea at the same time and we will be
engulfed by a tsunami. As it turns out, even that is unnecessary. All
it has to do is leave us to ourselves. It can always expect an Enrile
and Trillanes to get into a pissing contest and get all of us very
wet and desperately needing a bath. Why should anyone want to declare
war on us?
We
do a good job of it by ourselves to ourselves.
No comments:
Post a Comment