By Federico d.
Pascual Jr.
IT’S
NORMAL, BUT...: Back channeling is normal practice, usually
resorted to when the usual channels of communication do not seem to
work as desired. But not just any amateur is sent to do it.
As
in propaganda, a communication plan uses several media or lines
running parallel to each other but moving simultaneously in the same
direction to deliver the message to the intended receiver.
The
logic is simple. If you run several lines all meant to deliver
substantially the same message, and one or two of them fail, there is
still at least one line left to carry the message to the target.
In
diplomacy, secret back channeling is resorted to in delicate
situations when the traditional routes are proving to be problematic.
As some operators say, if you cannot enter through the front door,
why not try the back door?
(Sometimes
there is also resort to what is called “good offices” — but
that is another subject.)
*
* *
ENRILE
BYPASSED:
President
Noynoy Aquino has
said that he asked Sen. Antonio Trillanes to do back channeling on
the Scarborough (Panatag) problem after regular diplomatic efforts to
ease the tension while a diplomatic solution was being worked out had
hit a wall.
Based
on the President’s narration, Trillanes called him from China
offering to talk Scarborough with certain Chinese personalities who
the
senator
said
could help out.
Since
the regular efforts of the foreign office and the Philippine embassy
in Beijing seemed to be unproductive at the time, the President gave
the senator the go-signal. His instructions have not been revealed.
Senate President Juan
Ponce Enrile said during his interpellation of Trillanes days ago
that the junior senator had made some 16 secret trips to China as
part of his back channeling.
None
of those expeditions were made with the prior approval of the
Senate
president,
as the rules require, and not once did Trillanes report to the Senate
or to Enrile upon his return.
*
* *
BREACH
OF COURTESY: As the Trillanes tra-la-la is still shrouded in
secrecy, it has raised several questions, not the least of which is
what qualifications the frustrated coup plotter brings to the job as
the President’s diplomatic trouble-shooter.
Another
basic point is that the Congress being a separate and independent
branch of government, it appears improper for the Chief Executive to
send a senator on an errand WITHOUT the knowledge of the Senate
president.
Enrile
learned of Trillanes’ missions only when the two senators happened
to be present at a Cabinet meeting where the Scarborough question was
discussed.
Back
in the Senate, Trillanes told off Enrile during interpellation that
he is not under any obligation to report to the Senate president on
his errands for the President. A number of observers were jolted by
such display of arrogance.
*
* *
ABANGAN!:
The Enrile-Trillanes clash revealed the unsteady hold of Enrile
on the 23-member chamber. It has turned out that Trillanes,
emboldened by his Palace patron, is a key plotter in a move to depose
the Senate president.
The
coming weeks will see Enrile consolidating his position after
awakening to the fact that his open cooperation with Malacañang,
such as in the impeachment of then Chief Justice Renato C. Corona,
has failed to cement the support of the Palace for him.
Also
being watched is how Enrile will get even with Trillanes. This is
something the junior senator must expect after the Senate president
had gone out of his way to have him released from detention — only
to be repaid with an arrogant challenge.
*
* *
WHAT’S
THE DEAL?: President Aquino said Trillanes first called him from
China offering to do back channeling. That means that the senator was
already talking with the other side at that point.
That
means also that even before he left Manila, somebody had already
talked to him about being a point man for Beijing. It cannot be that
he flew to China clueless, was just walking around in that vast
country when he bumped into somebody claiming right connections.
Why
Trillanes? Who initiated the collaboration while he was still in
Manila? That person must have been promoting Chinese interests and
found the senator a good prospect for pushing such interests. Is
Trillanes operating alone?
Big
question: What is the deal? And is President Aquino in on that deal?
*
* *
TRAITOR!:
As revealed by Enrile from the Senate floor, Trillanes had called
Foreign Secretary Albert del Rosario a traitor.
That
is a serious accusation. When Trillanes pinned that tag on the
foreign secretary, was the agent reflecting the sentiment of his
principal in the Palace?
It
is reasonable to think that the President may have shared enough of
Trillanes’ assessment of Del Rosario to prompt him to send the
senator on a delicate diplomatic errand primarily entrusted to the
foreign secretary and the Philippine ambassador to Beijing.
Unless
the President disowns Trillanes and contradicts his assessment of the
foreign secretary, Del Rosario should offer to resign on the issue of
trust and confidence.
*
* *
AMATEUR
HOUR: It is bad politics and injurious to national unity for the
Chief Executive to meddle in internal administrative affairs of other
branches of government and weaken them in the process.
After
attacking and sowing division in the Supreme Court,
a separate branch, the President should have known better than to
raid the Senate and bypass the Senate president while bloating the
ego of a junior member into thinking he is bigger than the chamber’s
leader.
There
is such a thing as divide and rule, but we trust this is not the
President’s intention vis-à-vis co-equal branches.
Overall,
China — still in actual control of Scarborough — emerges as the
winner in this embarrassing Amateur Hour.
*
* *
RESEARCH:
Past POSTSCRIPTs can be accessed at manilamail.com.
Follow us via Twitter.com/@FDPascual.
Send
feedback to fdp333@yahoo.com
No comments:
Post a Comment