By Ninez
Cacho-Oliavares
Just
what state secrets did Senate President Juan Ponce-Enrile divulge
when he read the notes of then Ambassador to China Sonia Brady, as
claimed by Sen. Antonio Trillanes IV?
Truth
is, Trillanes does not know what he is talking about, especially the
part where he claims that Enrile “brazenly exposed state secrets
just to spite me and it eventually blew up on his face.”
As
far as public opinion goes, the Brady report blew up on Trillanes’
face, so much so that he may just be politically dead.
But
what state secrets were divulged? Enrile said nothing nor read
anything that could be categorized as state secrets, since what he
had disclosed, via the Brady notes, was precisely how Trillanes was
working against the interest of the country — such as his telling
Brady that no one in the country cares about Scarborough Shoal, and
that he hewed to the bilateral line of the Chinese, apart from bad
mouthing the Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) Secretary Albert del
Rosario. These are state secrets?
The
Brady notes contained the undesirable conduct of Trillanes as a back
channel negotiator, which has nothing to do with the so-called state
secrets.
In
fact, it was Trillanes himself who had divulged a state secret, i.e.,
that he was Noynoy’s back channel in China. As this pseudo-diplomat
who is moreover throughy wet behind the ears, should have realized, a
back channel is a secret move by a government for whatever reasons
that government believes a back channel is needed. He first spilled
the beans of his being the back channel in China talks in a major
daily where he also called the DFA chief a “traitor.”
What
particular state secrets then were divulged by Enrile through the
Brady notes as being claimed by Trillanes?
It
was also Noynoy who had divulged the lies of Trillanes, in that
Trillanes had claimed that he had been asked by Executive Secretary
to be the Palace’s backdoor negotiator when it was the other way
around. Noynoy himself who is just as inept in such matters, bared
that Trillanes had volunteered for the back channeling job, claiming
that it was the Chinese who wanted him as the Philippine negotiator,
which also made Noynoy himself look stupid, as he agreed to what the
Chinese officials purportedly wanted as negotiator, which would make
Trillanes an agent for the Chinese.
Enrile
was quoted as saying in a radio interview conducted by former
Ambassador to the US Ernesto Maceda that intelligence officers of the
People’s Republic of China’s Liberation Army helped Trillanes in
establishing contacts in Beijing while he was reportedly doing
backdoor negotiations with China.
The
newspaper report said Enrile had stated that Trillanes’ closeness
with top members of the Chinese military bolsters his theory that the
senator could be walking a treasonous line during his backdoor talks
with China on the South China Sea dispute.
“If
he is indeed, close to the intel service of China, you can go in and
out of China, that gives you the reason to understand why he was
saying that the Filipinos are not interested in Scarborough Shoal,”
he added.
“I
understand that his channel he developed is the intel service of the
Chinese embassy, which is actually the representative of the Chinese
military. The PRoC Armed Forces, the Liberation Army of China, as you
know, that is an institution that actually governs China,” said
Enrile.
Enrile
has pointed out that Trillanes had meetings with Chinese officials 16
times in Beijing, which trips Trillanes claimed were funded by the
Palace, but which the Palace refuses to confirm or deny.
What
is strange, however, is why some sectors who are pro-Noynoy and
pro-Trillanes (and they are few) insist on keeping such Brady notes
secret, as though it is better to keep the nation in the dark as to
what treasonous acts Philippine officials have been and are being
committed against the country and the nation--and all done in secret.
Trillanes
did the country and the nation a great disservice as Noynoy has done.
Filipinos
have a right to know when they are being screwed by their officials.
No comments:
Post a Comment