Dear Eddie (Limon),
BE FACTUAL:
Again, nothing personal against anyone, without resorting to DOUBLE SPEAK. It just so happens that corrupt practices ADD to the poor's suffering, particularly in Pinas. And truth does hurt, so does logic, but Lazir's writing is definitely not vitriolic. Had IHQ sufficiently answered earlier questions, Lazir needn't write, repeatedly, or? Therefore, repeating UNANSWERED questions is valid.
A liar would already STUMBLE, should he attempt to REPEAT what is NOT TRUE, all these many moons!
Lazir repeats, and is C O N S I S T E N T..., the mark of a TRUTHFUL writer, with INTEGRITY!
Where is the IHQ CLOSING of all of Lazir's valid questions?
TRUE VITRIOLIC AUTHOR, now a KGOR:
BTW, do you know that Alcoba authored REAL vitriolic language, one even addressed to Sir Barry Bowman?
In comparison, Lazir's truthful, hard-hitting mails are harmless, for Lazir doesn't use language most foul. Anyway, Esguerra PERSONALLY exalted the same Alcoba to KGOR, a few months after his vitriol came out, in Paris, July 2007! (Have you ever read Lazir writing texts like "How big is the hole in your brain?" Alcoba's words, devoid of truth/logic...)
STILL MISSING approx. EURO 5,000 (about P350,000.00!):
KOR is missing approx. Euro 5,000 Mushake donated, which he confirmed over the phone with Lazir, 2008! That was RY1999-2000, under Quiambao's time. Sir Barry Bowman said the KOR banks have been asked for records (of remittance from Germany)! Esguerra reported nothing in the KOR books! Yet this CEO failed to investigate! Why?
If not true, how come Mushake's attempt thru Dr Sir Hans Hack-Ullmer, a German jurist (Sikatuna-Maginoo recipient), great grandson of Dr Rizal's friend, Pastor Karl Ullmer, TO INFLUENCE Lazir to STOP asking about these missing funds, when Quiambao was Supremo, per a London Assembly souvenir program?
Even Sir Lucien Spittael was asked by Mushake to tell Lazir to STOP asking.
Why did Mushake himself NOT talk to Lazir to STOP asking? Did Mushake realize he did a "bum" confirming this story with Lazir in 2008?
A false claim from you (Lazir's mantra?), where you are NOT IN THE KNOW, could boomerang and HURT: you, your name, your reputation. Are you lawyering for Quiambao or Esguerra or Samuela? Are you the NEW spokesman for IHQ? No malice pls, just asking questions...
WHY IHQ DID NOT WANT LAZIR TO PERSONALLY SHOW UP?:
Lazir, without DELAY, personally gave 2 days to Sir Pedro Rosito (RY2006-2008 Supreme pursuivant), per latter's request, in Cebu in January 2008, purportedly to FACE and ANSWER IHQ (Supreme Council) officials in a kind of a face-to-face! Lazir also saw Cebu Judge
Arriesgado, per Sir Pedro's instructions! But this kind Judge (within earshot of Lazir) told Sir Pedro there's NOTHING to hold Lazir for!
Did that DISCOURAGE IHQ from seeing Lazir? Hence they didn't anymore CONFIRM date & time from the 2 days Lazir provided?
YES, IHQ's FAULT:
Lazir also had his Pinas CP# known.
WHY didn't IHQ confirm, thru txt or a courtesy phone call, that meeting is postponed, indefinitely?
Must Lazir go each of those 2 days and the IHQ officials are READY EVERY time? Whose FAULT that the meeting didn't take place as planned?
Lazir even had to cut his Mindanao trip, just to be in Manila by 20 January 2008, to be available for those 2 days! Lazir LOST those 2 days! IHQ's fault!
WHAT, WASTE ANOTHER IHQ TRIP?:
Why should Lazir NOW go to IHQ, after they DEFAULTED on the first one, and after FACT-twister Samuela expelled Moreno? (For alleged Manual violations, yet Samuela didn't investigate RA 646 violations: Sec 4, 7, 8) Are you saying Lazir is HOT to become a Knight under coward, un-Rizalian leaders, who TWIST facts..., Quiambao, Esguerra, Samuela?
EDDIE LIMON FAILED TO CORRECT ERRONEOUS "MUNTING NAYON" REPORTS:
While true that several Knights gave to COVER part of the Prague shortage, WHY DID IT HAPPEN in the first place? You were there, please explain...
Who were those 30 or so individuals, CONSISTENLY showing up, but were NON-PAYERS (bus trips, boat ride)? You were there, you should KNOW...
Did you bring companions that consistently SHOWED UP during bus trips, buffets, boat rides, but didn't REGISTER/PAY? You were there, please explain...
Was it Lazir's fault that many FAILED, premeditatedly, to register and pay fees? You were there, you should KNOW...
CHAOTIC, OUT-OF-CONTROL, yet not MENTIONED in "Munting Nayon"? WHY THE ROSY "Munting Nayon" REPORTS? You were there, please explain...
You were there and admit to the SHORTAGE, WHY DIDN'T YOU CORRECT THE "Munting Nayon" reports, which came out, but mentioned NOTHING about any problems, small or tiny:
- ordering another bus to accommodate some who got left behind?
- more people in the boat than were registered?
- more food consumed than was expected?
- more people in the hotel than was previously-counted?
You were there, you should KNOW and yet you DON'T?
Were you really in attendance?
Please explain...and "shed LIGHT".
Please do not twist the facts...
Some honest Knights heavily contributed (Sir Reghis, Sir Don, Sir Lucien, Sir Nonong, to name some), but the SHORTAGE is not gone!
Why the letter CIRCULATED to European chapters to HELP defray the Prague SHORTAGE?
If shortage is reduced to the minimum, to a manageable amount, why didn't Ex-Regional Cdr Paras just COVER this? Why didn't incumbent Regional Cdr Guansing pay for it? Why write to all European chapters, if SMALL/MINOR amount?
You were there, please "shed LIGHT".
If you cannot rebut all of Lazir's straight-forward, truthful, logical statements above, you lose.
"With malice toward none, with charity for all, with firmness in the right as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in;..." - Abraham Lincoln in his 2nd Inaugural Address, 04 March 1865
For country and people!
:)
Lazir
-consistently asking valid questions!
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
BE FACTUAL:
Again, nothing personal against anyone, without resorting to DOUBLE SPEAK. It just so happens that corrupt practices ADD to the poor's suffering, particularly in Pinas. And truth does hurt, so does logic, but Lazir's writing is definitely not vitriolic. Had IHQ sufficiently answered earlier questions, Lazir needn't write, repeatedly, or? Therefore, repeating UNANSWERED questions is valid.
A liar would already STUMBLE, should he attempt to REPEAT what is NOT TRUE, all these many moons!
Lazir repeats, and is C O N S I S T E N T..., the mark of a TRUTHFUL writer, with INTEGRITY!
Where is the IHQ CLOSING of all of Lazir's valid questions?
TRUE VITRIOLIC AUTHOR, now a KGOR:
BTW, do you know that Alcoba authored REAL vitriolic language, one even addressed to Sir Barry Bowman?
In comparison, Lazir's truthful, hard-hitting mails are harmless, for Lazir doesn't use language most foul. Anyway, Esguerra PERSONALLY exalted the same Alcoba to KGOR, a few months after his vitriol came out, in Paris, July 2007! (Have you ever read Lazir writing texts like "How big is the hole in your brain?" Alcoba's words, devoid of truth/logic...)
STILL MISSING approx. EURO 5,000 (about P350,000.00!):
KOR is missing approx. Euro 5,000 Mushake donated, which he confirmed over the phone with Lazir, 2008! That was RY1999-2000, under Quiambao's time. Sir Barry Bowman said the KOR banks have been asked for records (of remittance from Germany)! Esguerra reported nothing in the KOR books! Yet this CEO failed to investigate! Why?
If not true, how come Mushake's attempt thru Dr Sir Hans Hack-Ullmer, a German jurist (Sikatuna-Maginoo recipient), great grandson of Dr Rizal's friend, Pastor Karl Ullmer, TO INFLUENCE Lazir to STOP asking about these missing funds, when Quiambao was Supremo, per a London Assembly souvenir program?
Even Sir Lucien Spittael was asked by Mushake to tell Lazir to STOP asking.
Why did Mushake himself NOT talk to Lazir to STOP asking? Did Mushake realize he did a "bum" confirming this story with Lazir in 2008?
A false claim from you (Lazir's mantra?), where you are NOT IN THE KNOW, could boomerang and HURT: you, your name, your reputation. Are you lawyering for Quiambao or Esguerra or Samuela? Are you the NEW spokesman for IHQ? No malice pls, just asking questions...
WHY IHQ DID NOT WANT LAZIR TO PERSONALLY SHOW UP?:
Lazir, without DELAY, personally gave 2 days to Sir Pedro Rosito (RY2006-2008 Supreme pursuivant), per latter's request, in Cebu in January 2008, purportedly to FACE and ANSWER IHQ (Supreme Council) officials in a kind of a face-to-face! Lazir also saw Cebu Judge
Arriesgado, per Sir Pedro's instructions! But this kind Judge (within earshot of Lazir) told Sir Pedro there's NOTHING to hold Lazir for!
Did that DISCOURAGE IHQ from seeing Lazir? Hence they didn't anymore CONFIRM date & time from the 2 days Lazir provided?
YES, IHQ's FAULT:
Lazir also had his Pinas CP# known.
WHY didn't IHQ confirm, thru txt or a courtesy phone call, that meeting is postponed, indefinitely?
Must Lazir go each of those 2 days and the IHQ officials are READY EVERY time? Whose FAULT that the meeting didn't take place as planned?
Lazir even had to cut his Mindanao trip, just to be in Manila by 20 January 2008, to be available for those 2 days! Lazir LOST those 2 days! IHQ's fault!
WHAT, WASTE ANOTHER IHQ TRIP?:
Why should Lazir NOW go to IHQ, after they DEFAULTED on the first one, and after FACT-twister Samuela expelled Moreno? (For alleged Manual violations, yet Samuela didn't investigate RA 646 violations: Sec 4, 7, 8) Are you saying Lazir is HOT to become a Knight under coward, un-Rizalian leaders, who TWIST facts..., Quiambao, Esguerra, Samuela?
EDDIE LIMON FAILED TO CORRECT ERRONEOUS "MUNTING NAYON" REPORTS:
While true that several Knights gave to COVER part of the Prague shortage, WHY DID IT HAPPEN in the first place? You were there, please explain...
Who were those 30 or so individuals, CONSISTENLY showing up, but were NON-PAYERS (bus trips, boat ride)? You were there, you should KNOW...
Did you bring companions that consistently SHOWED UP during bus trips, buffets, boat rides, but didn't REGISTER/PAY? You were there, please explain...
Was it Lazir's fault that many FAILED, premeditatedly, to register and pay fees? You were there, you should KNOW...
CHAOTIC, OUT-OF-CONTROL, yet not MENTIONED in "Munting Nayon"? WHY THE ROSY "Munting Nayon" REPORTS? You were there, please explain...
You were there and admit to the SHORTAGE, WHY DIDN'T YOU CORRECT THE "Munting Nayon" reports, which came out, but mentioned NOTHING about any problems, small or tiny:
- ordering another bus to accommodate some who got left behind?
- more people in the boat than were registered?
- more food consumed than was expected?
- more people in the hotel than was previously-counted?
You were there, you should KNOW and yet you DON'T?
Were you really in attendance?
Please explain...and "shed LIGHT".
Please do not twist the facts...
Some honest Knights heavily contributed (Sir Reghis, Sir Don, Sir Lucien, Sir Nonong, to name some), but the SHORTAGE is not gone!
Why the letter CIRCULATED to European chapters to HELP defray the Prague SHORTAGE?
If shortage is reduced to the minimum, to a manageable amount, why didn't Ex-Regional Cdr Paras just COVER this? Why didn't incumbent Regional Cdr Guansing pay for it? Why write to all European chapters, if SMALL/MINOR amount?
You were there, please "shed LIGHT".
If you cannot rebut all of Lazir's straight-forward, truthful, logical statements above, you lose.
"With malice toward none, with charity for all, with firmness in the right as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in;..." - Abraham Lincoln in his 2nd Inaugural Address, 04 March 1865
For country and people!
:)
Lazir
-consistently asking valid questions!
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
I'm just a regular member of KOR but I think I might be able to shed light into your concern regarding the accounting of KOR funds. You should direct your question to the Supreme Council and not to a disgruntled individual. I'm not knowledgeable about the governance of Public Corporations, chartered by the Philippine government,i.e. KOR, if they are required by law to make their records accessible to the public or not. I do know that not-for-profit organizations, i.e IRC 501(c)3..,(the equivalent of a chartered Public Corporation in the Phil.) registered and operating in the US, must allow the public to have access to their financial records. That being said, it's more than likely that public corporations in the Phil. have the same requirement.
However, that's not the primary reason why I got involved in this discussion between you and Lazir. I'm afraid that unbeknown to you, Lazir is using you as his conduit to disseminate his vitriolic remarks. Lazir's allegations are nothing new but repetitions of his personal mantra, directed to the same KOR officers covering the same subjects; Paras, euros, Zerrudo et al.....
Lazir, if your personal conviction is that strong and you firmly believe that you and others were wronged and maligned by the Supreme Council, why don't you request a PERSONAL AUDIENCE before this august body and demand explanations and answers to your concerns and allegations. You'll have more credibility if you do instead of your current subversive tactic of a "public trial through the media, i.e. e-mail. I'm quite sure that the Supreme Council will grant your request to have your "day in court". Comparing their actions to the alleged perpetrators of the tragic Magindanao Massacre is outlandish, irresponsible, and inaccurate.
To the rest of the readers, if you don't want to receive more of Lazir's transgressions through e-mail, go to your Mail Settings, look for "how to block unwanted e-mails" and enter all of Lazir's known email address in the "block section". I tried this one before and it worked but unfortunately all I had was just one of his many addresses. If your setting allows for keywords enter all his aka's i.e. laong laan, lazir and etc.... "A parasite will not survive is there is no willing host."
Last but not the least, here's an example of how Lazir stretches the truth and make unfounded allegations. It's a fact that the Prague chapter did have fund shortages in hosting the 4th ERA in Prague. Truth be told, when the attendees learned of this dire situation, they (attendees) voluntarily contributed additional funds to help Sir Nuobiko defray the expenses. As a matter of fact, one of the Supreme Council Trustees, Sir Reghis Romero II, KGOR, personally contributed a large amount, enough to cover a major portion of the shortage. I know, I was one of the attendees who contributed. The noble part of this anecdote is that Sir Nuobiko did not ask for assistance, it's just brother knights helping out their brother knights.
Eddie Limon
No comments:
Post a Comment