Featured Post

MABUHAY PRRD!

Monday, October 10, 2011

Fallacies: Common Techniques of Manipulation




Ad hominem: an argument that attacks the person who holds a view or advances an argument,rather than commenting on the view or responding to the argument.

Appeal to probability: assumes that because something could happen, it is inevitable that it will happen. This is the premise on which Murphy's Law is based.

Argument from fallacy: if an argument for some conclusion is fallacious, then the conclusion is also fallacious.

If P, then Q.
P is a fallacious argument.
Therefore, Q is false.
Example: If 1+1=10 is wrong in decimal arithmetic, then it must be universally wrong.

Bare assertion fallacy: premise in an argument is assumed to betrue purely because it says that it is true.


Fact 1: A website says that black is another form of white.

Fact 2: The same website says that it is true.

Conclusion: Therefore, black is indeed another form of white.

Base rate fallacy: using weak evidence to make a probability judgment without taking into account known empirical statistics about the probability.

Conjunction fallacy: assumption that an outcome simultaneously satisfying multiple conditions is more probable than an outcome satisfying a single one of them.

Correlative based fallacies

Denying the correlative: where attempts are made at introducing alternatives where there are none.

Suppressed correlative: where a correlative is redefined so that one alternative is made impossible.

Fallacy of necessity: a degree of unwarranted necessity isplaced in the conclusion based on the necessity of one or more of its premises.

False dilemma (false dichotomy): where two alternative statements are held to be the only possible options, when in reality there are more.

If-by-whiskey: An answer that takes side of the questioner's suggestive question.

Ignoratio elenchi (irrelevant conclusion or irrelevant thesis)

Homunculus fallacy: where a "middle-man" is used for explanation, this usually leads to regressive middle-man. Explanations without actually explaining the real nature of a function or a process.

Masked man fallacy: the substitution of identical designators in a true statement can lead to a false one.

Naturalistic fallacy: a fallacy that claims that if something is natural, then it is "good" or "right".

Nirvana fallacy: when solutions to problems are said not to be right because they are not perfect.

Negative Proof fallacy: that, because a premise cannot be proven false, the premise must be true; or that, because a premise cannot be proven true, the premise must be false.

Package-deal fallacy: consists of assuming that things often grouped together by tradition or culture must always be grouped that way

Red Herring: also called a "fallacy of relevance." This occurs when the speaker is trying to distract the audience by arguing some new topic, or just generally going off topic with an argument.

Affirming a disjunct: concluded that one logical disjunction must be false because the other disjunct is true; A or B; A; therefore not B.

Affirming the consequent: the antecedent in an indicative conditional is claimed to be true because the consequent is true; if A, then B;B, therefore A.

Denying the antecedent: the consequent in an indicative conditional is claimed to be false because the antecedent is false; if A, then B; not A, therefore not B.



No comments: