Featured Post

MABUHAY PRRD!

Tuesday, November 17, 2015

Que horror! President Noynoy Aquino was not invited to the Typhoon Yolanda commemoration!


November 12, 2015
by FallenAngel
President BS Aquino should practice what he preaches and move on from his habit of looking back to his parents' suffering.
MalacaƱang talking head Sonny Coloma, of course, would like us to believe that there was no invitation, therefore BS Aquino was not able to attend. Parang patampo pa nga ata eh. (It was almost like he was pouting that there was no invitation.)
Instead, on that day, November 8, BS Aquino was attending the wedding of Andrew Tan’s son. Andrew Tan is one of the business tycoons in the Philippines. Critics see this move as BS Aquino supposedly prioritizing those who are potential sources of campaign funds instead of the people whom he took an oath to serve as president.
Not long after, a snapshot of the formal invitation from the city Mayor dated October 27 – almost two weeks before the actual event – was making its way through social media.
yolanda2ndannivinvitetaclobancity
I’m waiting to hear from the talking heads, or from BS Aquino himself, whether any of them will claim that somehow, the letter “got lost in the bureaucratic maze”. Or perhaps they really did just ignore the letter, because after all, “you are a Romualdez and the president is an Aquino.” There was supposedly no RSVP from the Palace.
Next, we hear from the Palace that even if BS Aquino was not able to attend, he “offered prayers for those who died in the aftermath of the typhoon,” and that his government “continues to address the needs of the typhoon victims.”
If you haven’t noticed, MalacaƱang likes spinning bullshit and making excuses, and they’re not even good at it.
Critics of the administration point out that BS Aquino and his administration would like to avoid any mention of Typhoon Yolanda and Tacloban because they serve as a big red mark on the “spotless image” that this government has of itself.
Recall that one of the first things BS Aquino did after the storm hit was to blame Tacloban officials for their supposed lack of preparedness, even if – BS Aquino said it himself – the data was incomplete. BS Aquino was insisting, before the storm, that the government was prepared to face Typhoon Yolanda, and that he also wanted “zero casualties”, as if that’s even possible. For him, everything is Tacloban’s fault, especially since they tarnished his government’s image, and most especially, because the local government is run by a political rival.
Recall also, that then Secretary for Interior and Local Government Mar Roxas was in Tacloban before the storm hit, and was reportedly satisfied by the preparations made. But I digress…
The real point I wanted to make here is this:
Shouldn’t the written invitation be just a formality?
…which leads to the more poignant and obvious conclusion:
BS Aquino should have gone, regardless of whether he was invited or not.
In the corporate world, bosses value employees who have initiative. They like those who don’t have to be told what to do and are self-starters. They like those who think of and anticipate what needs to be done even before the boss says and communicates so. The term in the vernacular is may kusa, or may kusang loob.
I think the Tacloban people – who are part of the “bosses” BS Aquino serves – would have appreciated it if, even without a formal invitation, BS Aquino had made his presence known at the anniversary rites. It would have shown that, as president of the entire Republic of the Philippines, he was in solidarity with them, even if it did come only two years after.
I guess that was too much to ask of BS Aquino, though.
BS Aquino is president only to those loyal to the Aquino family name, and those who are unconditionally aligned with him and sing praises to him and his government. If you are a political rival, are part of a locale governed by a political rival, however, you don’t exist. Same goes if you criticize him for absolutely anything, even if it has solid basis.
He has not been able to put national interest above petty politics. Worst of all, he will forever blame other people for things that, as president of the republic, he should have taken command responsibility of.
So, I guess it should have come as no surprise that he would rather skip the anniversary rites. The people there would have nothing but grievances and not-so-kind words for how this administration had handled the aftermath and the relief operations.
BS Aquino should have gone to the rites then and taken all the grievances and criticism, like a man. He should have owned up to all the shortcomings of his administration for all the things that they could control. That, however, is impossible for a man who has, up to this day, been unable to show any empathy whatsoever.
For BS Aquino’s part, Tacloban and Typhoon Yolanda will forever serve as a reminder of just what kind of government his was: petty, image-conscious, unable to take criticism, unable to assume responsibility, and nothing but show.
The only thing that Tacloban and the rest of the Philippines can look forward to, is that by the next anniversary BS Aquino is no longer the president. Unless BS Aquino’s successor also subscribes to his Daang Matagal, este, Daang Matuwid, then there is at least a glimmer of hope that attention given to Tacloban will get better.
Here’s to hoping that things do get better for Tacloban from here on.

APEC 2015: a time for Filipinos to reflect on their place in the global economy


November 12, 2015
by benign0
What do ordinary Filipinos really want to get out of the imperative to “showcase” the Philippines’ best foot to the delegates of the coming Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) forum that Manila is hosting this year? For many, it will be an opportunity to go on an extended vacation, taking up the “encouragement” coming from the Philippine government itself which, in recent weeks, has announced some strong measures to ensure that all goes swimmingly for the delegates during their brief stay in Manila. But for the majority who cannot afford to take vacations on such whim, they will simply have to stay home and watch.
The effort to dress the Philippines in its Sunday best before the APEC 2015 delegates is a worthwhile pursuit, to be fair. After all, cleaning your house before one hosts a social event is a sign of respect for one’s guests. As such, the call to “gladly accept any inconvenience to make it happen” issued by  Inquirer columnist Randy David today has merit. It is time Filipinos see themselves as part of a bigger gig. We should start seeing the bigger world as something more than a place to scrape OFW dollars off from.
apec_manila_2015(1)
In order to be a better member of the global economic community, Filipinos need a fundamental change in thinking. Much of what makes a country great is in its objective capability to offer a clear value proposition on the global stage. To put this notion in harsher perspective, Filipinos need to be able to face this confronting question:
If the Philippines and its people were to suddenly disappear tomorrow — swallowed up by the oceans, say — would they be missed?
Hold that thought while we come down to a more micro view and consider the plight of the Lumads. The Lumad peoples are a group of indigenous people of the southern Philippines. It is a Cebuano term meaning “native” or “indigenous”. The term is short for Katawhang Lumad (literally “indigenous peoples”), the autonym officially adopted by the delegates of the Lumad Mindanao Peoples Federation (LMPF) founding assembly on 26 June 1986 at the Guadalupe Formation Center, Balindog, Kidapawan, Cotabato, Philippines. It is the self-ascription and collective identity of the indigenous peoples of Mindanao.
For the Lumad, securing their rights to ancestral domain is as urgent as the Moros’ quest for self-determination. However, much of their land has already been registered in the name of multinational corporations, logging companies and other wealthy Filipinos, many of whom are, relatively speaking, recent settlers to Mindanao. Today, they are an endangered peoples and have been victims of acts of terrorism and intimidation allegedly perpetrated by all armed groups — including the Philippine military — attempting to secure territory within their ancestral lands.
But despite a gallant publicity campaign over the last several months mounted by activists and various religious groups along different fronts and channels, very little headway has been achieved in directing a significant enough chunk of Philippine society’s attention to the plight of the Lumads. In comparison, the cold-blooded massacre of of 44 members of the Philippine police’s elite Special Action Force (SAF) troops by Islamic terrorists in Mamasapano earlier this year ignited broad awareness of the Aquino government’s illicit covert activities in the south. Such was the breadth and depth of the outrage exhibited by the Philippine public over this atrocity that the flagship initiative of President Benigno Simeon ‘BS’ Aquino III to create an autonomous Bangsamoro “nation” in the south was all but permanently derailed.
Whilst, for many months, Filipinos showed a deep care for the plight of the families of these “Fallen 44”, there has been no commensurate indignation outside of a small clique of activists reserved for the Lumads in these recent months. Why was it so easy for intense mass outrage to erupt within minutes that news broke of the massacre of 44 SAF troopers and such a hard uphill slog for activists to raise a similar level of indignation on behalf of the Lumads?
Perhaps it comes back to applying the same confronting question to the plight of the Lumads.
If the Lumads were to disappear from the face of the planet tomorrow, who will miss them?
Callous as that question may come across to many of us, it still, nonetheless, demands an answer. To make the question even more relevant to Filipinos, perhaps this next question — made even more confronting in this context — should be considered carefully:
If the AlDub pair, Maine ‘Yaya Dub’ Mendoza and Alden Richards, were to disappear tomorrow, who will miss them?
Who matters in this world is an easy question to ponder. Mainstream media answers that question everyday with its headlines alone. Social media does it even better — because the digitised nature of the data it collects makes “trending” analysis accessible to every man and his dog today.
But the question of why we care about certain people and not others is a more disturbing question to mull over. Why are millions of Filipinos willing to fork out hard-earned cash and endure hours of traffic and parking hell to watch the mating dance of the AlDub “love team” live for an hour at the Philippine Arena but cannot be bothered to take a few minutes off to even just sign an online petition to raise awareness for the Lumads?
It’s simple, really.
The place you enjoy in this world is determined by how well you make yourself matter to others.
In light of all that, we can now step back up again to the bigger question relevant to the Philippines’ hosting of the APEC meet this year. What place does the Philippines enjoy in the radars of the awesome global powers-that-be who will be honouring Manila with their presence this year?
Has the Philippines mounted a good enough effort since gaining independence in 1946 to make itself truly matter to the rest of the world?
By all means, let us dress in our Sunday best when we meet and greet the APEC delegates in the coming days. We should, however, not lose sight of the bigger job that we have so far failed to do — to build a nation that truly matters. One that we could be objectively proud of.
[NB: Parts of this article were lifted from the Wikipedia.org article “Lumad peoples” in a manner compliant to the terms stipulated in the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License that governs usage of content made available in this site.]

Monday, November 9, 2015

How Soy Can Kill You and Save Your Life

by 

EATING SOY CAN KILL YOU! Scan the media reports and surf the Internet, and you’re bound to come across scary claims that would lead you to believe this is true. You may have heard:
  • Soy will give you breast cancer.
  • Soy formula is dangerous to babies.
  • Genetically modified soy foods may modify you.
  • Soy foods block your thyroid function.
  • Soy prevents the absorption of minerals and interferes with digestion.
  • Tofu causes Alzheimer’s disease.
As some of you may be aware, I often recommend soy as part of a whole foods diet. Many people question why I include these foods in light of such startling media coverage on the dangers of soy. The reason is relatively simple.
I have reviewed reams of research and many claims for and against soy foods. From the studies available, I can tell you that soy is neither as good as the proponents say, nor as evil as the critics claim. I wish we had more convincing science to report, but we don’t. The key is to take all the available evidence together and see what shakes out.
In today’s blog I have done that for you. I will review some of the recent data for and against soy, and provide you with a few guidelines and things to remember when choosing soy foods.
What the Data Says about Soy
If you want an excellent, unbiased, scientifically sound review of all the relevant human data on soy, I recommend reading the 100-page report from the Agency for HealthCare Research and Quality entitled,The Effects of Soy on Health Outcomes, which reviewed thousands of studies based on rigorous criteria for scientific validity. Its conclusion was this: There is no evidence of significant benefit or harm based on the quality of evidence that exists today.
The dangers of soy are overstated. The benefits may be too.
So what’s a confused consumer to do? Give up on soy until we know for sure? Or chow down on soy nuts? Don’t panic. There are some things we do know about soy, both good and bad.
First, you should be aware that the amount of soy used in many of these studies was much higher than what we normally consume — the average dose of soy was equivalent to one pound of tofu or three soy protein shakes a day. That’s a lot of soy! Most people just don’t eat like that. So when you read negative things about soy, remember that many of those claims are based on poorly designed studies that don’t apply to real-world consumption.
You could apply that thinking to other studies, too — like those that show that broccoli contains natural pesticides or that celery is high in toxins. Sure, those foods might cause you some problems — but not in the amounts that most of us eat. The same is true for soy.
Second, it’s important to recognize that many of the common claims about soy simply don’t pan out when you look at the evidence carefully. Let’s review four of these claims and the science behind them so you can have a better understanding of the real relationships between soy consumption and potential health threats.
#1 “Soy Causes Breast Cancer”
Because soy foods contain natural plant compounds (called isoflavones) that appear to work like hormones, some people worry that they could increase hormonally driven conditions like breast cancer. But that doesn’t seem to be the case. In fact, research findings (i) suggest just the opposite:
  • All population studies (studies of groups of people) of soy either show reduced breast cancer risk or no effect.
  • The only studies to show increased cancer risk are on mice with no ovaries or damaged immune systems who eat high amounts of processed soy.
  • Studies in mice WITH ovaries and functioning immune systems show inhibition of tumor growth.
  • Mice studies may not reflect the effect of soy on humans (in case you didn’t notice, mice and humans are not the same species).
  • High breast tissue density is linked to a higher risk of breast cancer. Breast tissue density increases with estrogen replacement, but decreases with isoflavone consumption in postmenopausal women. That’s a good thing.
  • Eating soy foods at an early age (childhood and the teen years) appears to have a significant protective effect against breast cancer.
If you really want to reduce your risk of breast cancer, drink less alcohol and eat less trans and saturated fats — all of these compounds may raise risk in high amounts. If it’s a choice between chicken nuggets and tofu, I recommend tofu!
#2 “Soy Formula Could Harm a Baby’s Development”
Some 20 million infants have used soy formula since the 1960s — but some people are concerned that the isoflavones it contains could affect a child’s growth and reproductive development. Yet the only large, long-term study on humans, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, (ii) found that there were no major health differences in 811 men and women between the ages of 20 and 34 who had been fed either soy or milk formula as infants.
More recently, a report issued by the National Toxicology Program Center for the Evaluation of Risks to Human Reproduction concluded that there just isn’t enough human or animal data to say for sure whether soy formula harms a baby’s developmental or reproductive health.
So what should a mother do? First, breastfeed if at all possible, for as long as possible — ideally until your child is one year old. If that’s not possible and you have to use soy- or dairy-based formula, don’t beat yourself up about it. If there are any risks, they are likely to be very small. Hopefully, continuing research will shed more light on this question.
#3 “Soy is a Thyroid Poison”
I think this claim makes a mountain out of a molehill. Yes, there’s no doubt that soy can affect yourthyroid gland — the real question is, how much does it take? If you’ve read that soy is bad for your thyroid, you’re probably reading claims based on a few poorly-designed studies that have been blown out of proportion.
Instead, consider this: A review of the research found no significant effects of soy on the thyroid except in people who are iodine deficient — a condition that is rare in this country.
Another well-designed study in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (iii) studied the effect of realistic amounts of soy protein on hormones, including thyroid hormone. It found that soy had no significant effects on these hormones.
Based on my assessment of this and other research, I am convinced that normal amounts of traditional soy foods pose no risk to thyroid function.
#4 “Fermented Soy is Better than Non-fermented Soy”
Now here’s a claim that DOES have some basis in fact. That’s because soybeans — along with other beans, nuts, and seeds — contain compounds called phytates, which bind to minerals inside your body and contain some potentially harmful compounds.
The Asian cultures that have traditionally consumed soy typically ferment it first. This process breaks soy down and makes it easier to digest. Plus, fermentation adds extra nutrients and probiotics (“good” bacteria) to soy. For these reasons, I prefer fermented soy foods, like miso, natto, tempeh, tofu and some brands of soy milk.
So, should you eat soy? My answer is YES — but with two very important guidelines:
  1. Say YES to whole, real soy. The Okinawans are the world’s longest-lived people, probably in part because of their diet. For more than five millennia, they’ve eaten whole, organic and fermented soy foods like miso, tempeh, tofu, soy milk, and edamame (young soybeans in the pod). One to two servings a day of any of these foods are fine.
  2. Say NO to processed soy. That includes soy protein isolate and concentrates, genetically engineered soy foods (typically made from Monsanto’s Roundup soybeans), soy supplements, and soy junk foods like soy cheese, soy ice cream, soy oil, and soy burgers. They don’t have the thousands of years of traditional use that whole soy foods do, are processed, and contain unhealthy fats and other compounds. I have real concerns about these types of soy.
In truth, good human studies on soy are limited, but those we do have suggest that soy may help lowercholesterol, prevent cancer, increase bone density, protect the kidneys of people with diabetes, and relieve menopausal symptoms like hot flashes.
When you are considering the media reports about soy, here are some things to remember:
  1. The dangers of soy are overstated (and the benefits may be, too).
  2. We eat far too much processed soy (and processed foods in general). Stay away from those in your diet including soy protein concentrates or isolates, hydrolyzed or textured vegetable protein, hydrogenated soy bean oil, non-organic sources of soy, and soy junk food like soy cheese and ice cream. Don’t eat them.
  3. Whole soy foods can be a source of good quality protein and plant compounds that help promote health.
  4. Eat only organic soy. Stay away from genetically modified versions.
  5. Replace soy oil with olive oil, fish oil, nuts, and seeds.
  6. Breastfeed your child. I prefer that no one feed dairy or soy formula to their babies, but if you have to, try not to worry about it.
  7. Don’t worry about soy’s effect on breast cancer if you eat it in the forms and amounts I recommend. It has even been shown to protect against breast cancer if you start eating it at a young age.
  8. The effects on the thyroid are not significant or relevant unless you are deficient in iodine (which you can easily get from eating fish, seaweed or sea vegetables, or iodized salt).
I’m eager to see more research on the effects of soy on our health. But as we wait for more studies, there’s no need to pass up this healthful and delicious food. It can be safely included as part of a whole foods diet — which is one of the most important keys to lifelong vibrant health.
Have you experienced any health problem because of eating soy?
Have you experienced any health benefits from consuming soy?
Do you agree or disagree with any of the arguments about this controversial subject that I’ve listed?
Let me know your thoughts by leaving a comment below.
To your good health,
Mark Hyman, MD
References
(i) Messina, M. 2010. A brief historical overview of the past two decades of soy and isoflavone research. J Nutr. 140(7): 1350S–4S.
(ii) Strom, B.L., Schinnar, R., Ziegler, E.E. et al. 2001. Exposure to soy-based formula in infancy and endocrinological and reproductive outcomes in young adulthood. JAMA. 286(7): 807–14.
(iii) Persky, V.W., Turyk, M.E., Wang, L. et al. 2002. Effect of soy protein on endogenous hormones in postmenopausal women. Am J Clin Nutr. 75(1): 145–53.

What’s So Bad About Tofu?

What's So Bad About Tofu?
Many health-conscious Americans, in an effort to improve their eating habits, have switched to eating tofu in place of meat or eggs. The soy industry would have you believe that this is a smart move for your heart health, but in reality processed soy, which includes tofu, is not a health food.
You are much better off eating organic eggs, grass-fed meat and raw dairy products than you are eating processed soy.
“Unlike in Asia where people eat small amounts of whole soybean products, western food processors separate the soybean into two golden commodities–protein and oil. There’s nothing safe or natural about this,” Dr. Daniel says.


“Today’s high-tech processing methods not only fail to remove the anti-nutrients and toxins that are naturally present in soybeans but leave toxic and carcinogenic residues created by the high temperatures, high pressure, alkali and acid baths and petroleum solvents,” she continues.
The worst of the worst when it comes to soy products are the fractionated products like soy protein isolate and hydrolyzed plant protein, as all processed soy contains phytates that block mineral absorption and trypsin inhibitors that block proper digestion.
Tofu is one step up because it’s a whole soy product, but it still contains the anti-nutrients mentioned above.
Health Problems Linked to Soy
Among the many health problems linked to a high-soy diet are:
• Thyroid problems, including weight gain, lethargy, malaise, fatigue, hair loss, and loss of libido
• Premature puberty and other developmental problems in babies, children and adolescents
• Cancer
• Brain damage 
• Reproductive disorders 
• Soy allergies
Meanwhile, studies reviewed by Dr. Daniel and colleagues have found that soy does not reliably lower cholesterol, and in fact raises homocysteine levels in many people, which has been found to increase your risk of heart disease, stroke, and birth defects. In fact, according to Dr. Daniel, soy can increase your risk of heart disease.
As a result, she and other experts have sent a 65-page petition to the FDA asking them to retract the “soy prevents heart disease” health claim that they approved back in 1999, and let’s hope they do the right thing and comply.
It’s very important to know also that children and babies, who are still developing, are particularly vulnerable to soy’s hormone-mimicking effects. A Lancet study showed that the daily exposure to estrogen-imitating chemicals for infants who consume soy formulas was 6-11 times higher than adults consuming soy foods.
And the blood concentration of these hormones was 13,000 to 22,000 times higher than estrogen in the blood. An infant exclusively fed soy formula receives the estrogenic equivalent (based on body weight) of up to five birth control pills per day. So please do not feed your baby soy infant formula, or your toddler soy foods (if you can’t breastfeed and are looking for a formula alternative, here’s a recipe for a healthy homemade infant formula). The effects are so potent that even pregnant women should avoid eating soy products for the safety of their unborn child.

QUESTIONS THAT HAUNT ME!

If you have 
sex with a prostitute against her will, is it considered rape or 
shoplifting?


Can you 
cry under water?


How 
important does a person have to be before they are considered assassinated 
instead of just murdered?


Why do 
you have to 'put your two cents in'... but it's only a 'penny for your 
thoughts'?  Where's that extra penny going to?
  
Once 
you're in heaven, do you get stuck wearing the clothes you were buried in for 
eternity?


Why does 
a round pizza come in a square box?
 


What 
disease did cured ham actually have?
 


How is 
it that we put man on the moon before we figured out it would be a good idea to 
put wheels on luggage?
 


Why is it 
that people say they 'slept like a baby' when babies wake up like every two 
hours?
 


If a deaf 
person has to go to court, is it still called a hearing?
 



Why are 
you IN a movie, but you're ON TV?
 


Why do 
people pay to go up tall buildings and then put money in binoculars to look at 
things on the ground?
 


Why do 
doctors leave the room while you change?
 
They're going to see you naked anyway.
 


Why is 
'bra' singular and 'panties' plural?
 


Why do 
toasters always have a setting that burns the toast to a horrible crisp, which 
no decent human being would eat?
 


If Jimmy 
cracks corn and no one cares, why is there a stupid song about 
him?
 


 
If the 
professor on Gilligan's Island can make a radio out of a coconut, why can't he 
fix a hole in a boat?
 


Why does 
Goofy stand erect while Pluto remains on all fours?
 
They're both dogs!
 


If Wile E. Coyote had enough money to buy all that ACME crap, why didn't he just buy 
dinner?
 


If corn 
oil is made from corn, and vegetable oil is made from vegetables, what is baby 
oil made from?
 


If 
electricity comes from electrons, does morality come from 
morons?
 


Do the 
Alphabet song and Twinkle, Twinkle Little Star have the same 
tune?
 


Why did 
you just try singing the two songs above?
 


Why do they call it an asteroid when it's outside the hemisphere, but call it a 
hemorrhoid when it's in your butt?
 


Did you 
ever notice that when you blow in a dog's face, he gets mad at you, but when you 
take him for a car ride, he sticks his head out the window?
 

Why, 
Why, Why


Why 
do we press harder on a remote control when we know the batteries are going 
dead? 


Why 
do banks charge a fee on 'insufficient funds' when they know there is not enough 
money?


Why 
does someone believe 
you when you say there are four billion stars, but check when you say the paint 
is wet?
 

Why 
do they use sterilized needles for death by lethal injection? 


Why 
doesn't Tarzan have a beard?


Why 
does Superman stop bullets with his chest, but ducks when you throw a revolver 
at him?


Why 
do Kamikaze pilots wear helmets?
 

Whose 
idea was it to put an 'S' in the word 'lisp'? 


If 
people evolved from apes,
 why are there still apes?

Why 
is it that no matter what color bubble bath you use the bubbles are always 
white?


Is 
there ever a day that mattresses
 are 
not on sale?


Why 
do people constantly return to the refrigerator with hopes that something new to 
eat will have materialized?


Why 
do people keep running over a string a dozen times with their vacuum cleaner, 
then reach down, pick it up, examine it, then put it down to give the vacuum one 
more chance? 


Why 
is it that no plastic bag will open from the end on your first 
try?


How 
do those dead bugs get into those enclosed light 
fixtures?


When 
we are in the supermarket and someone rams our ankle with a shopping cart then 
apologizes for doing so, why do we say, 'It's all right?' Well, it isn't all 
right, so why don't we say, 'That really hurt, why don't you watch where you're 
going?' 


Why 
is it that whenever you attempt to catch something that's falling off the table 
you always manage to knock something else over? 


In 
winter why do we try to keep the house as warm as it was in summer when we 
complained about the heat?


How 
come you never hear father-in-law jokes?


And 
my FAVORITE......
 
The 
statistics on sanity is that one out of every four persons are suffering from 
some sort of mental illness. Think of your three best friends -- if they're 
okay, then it's you. 

Sunday, November 8, 2015

3 steps to stop criminal syndicates operating at NAIA (includes firing PNoy’s cousin Honrado)


November 7, 2015
by Ilda
As most Filipinos know by now, the news of the laglag bala or bullet planting scam at the Ninoy Aquino International Airport (NAIA) has caught the attention of the international community and has tainted the already fragile reputation of the Philippines as a tourist haven. Popular Fox News Channelanchor Greta Van Susteren has featured a segment of the scam in her show while feeling sorry for the Filipino community for having to expose such a terrible thing with her audience.
Before she started her segment, Van Susteren assumed she was going to receive a barrage of hate comments from the Filipino community afterwards but the comment section on the Fox News site was filled with much appreciation from Filipinos who thought it was good of her to highlight the ineptness of the Philippine government in catching the criminal syndicates operating the scam.  
NAIA bullet planting scam reenacted on a Japanese video to warn travellers to the Philippines to be vigilant
NAIA bullet planting scam reenacted on a Japanese video to warn travellers to the Philippines to be vigilant
Yes, exposing the gross incompetence of the Philippine government under the leadership of President Benigno Simeon Aquino to the outside world is the next logical step because he and those protecting him are not moved by outrage from the Filipino public anymore. BS Aquino and his cabinet members have become so thick-faced, or what is referred to in Filipino as makakapal na ang mukha, that perhaps outrage from the members of the international community might, just might, move them to develop a conscience or at least shape up even just for appearance’s sake. Indeed, there are times when you need to embarrass the public servants to make them do their jobs.
The Japanese also created a demonstration video warning their own people who are planning on travelling to the Philippines by showing how security officers in Manila’s international airport supposedly plant the bullet inside an unsuspecting passenger’s luggage while it goes through the security screen. The video is complete with a cardboard cutout image of a bullet with the camera zooming in on it. The Japanese presenters looked very serious during the demonstration.  It is interesting to note how Japanese society takes these matters seriously and how they take precautions to protect themselves against such criminal activities. They do not take chances.
One cannot help but compare the Japanese people’s reaction with that of some Filipinos like presidential candidate Mar Roxas who initially denied bullet planting was the work of a criminal syndicate operating at the NAIA. At some point Roxas even parroted rabid Aquino supporter Cynthia Patag and claimed that the issue could be a simple demolition job to discredit the BS Aquino government. Some people have noted that Roxas proved that he is not a problem solver. His statement revealed that he is just like BS Aquino – a blamer. Instead of acknowledging that there is a problem at NAIA, he denies it and puts the blame on an imagined “enemy”.  The behavior he exhibited in recent days is an indication of the behavior he will apply if he ever wins the Presidency – arrogant and rude. It will be even worse because he seems like a guy who will let his position get to his head.
The problem with both Roxas and his supporters is they spoke too soon even before a formal investigation was conducted. They could have waited for what the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) had to say about it. As it turns out, the bureau confirmed that there is a criminal syndicate operating at NAIA:
An extortion syndicate preying mainly on the elderly and overseas Filipino workers (OFWs) and involving personnel from various state agencies, not only plants bullets in bags of airline passengers but also harasses them by questioning their travel papers, the Inquirer has learned.
Initial findings by agents of the National Bureau of Investigation reveal that some porters identify potential victims of the “tanim-bala” (bullet-planting) scam and accomplices in the security and immigration services take over from them inside the four terminals of Ninoy Aquino International Airport (Naia).
Mar Roxas seems to be acting as the unofficial presidential spokesman nowadays.
Mar Roxas seems to be acting as the unofficial presidential spokesman nowadays.
I don’t even know why Roxas keeps releasing statements about current issues as if he is already the President of the Philippines or is still part of BS Aquino’s cabinet. He is just turning voters off by being such a motor mouth. His political rivals do not need to mount a demolition job when he already does it to himself.  Some people have also noted that it seems like BS Aquino is letting Roxas do the talking for him in the twilight of the former’s Presidency. It’s like Roxas is already assuming the position.
Speaking of BS Aquino, if he was really serious about solving the bullet planting scam, he needs to act soon lest voters turn against the Liberal Party in droves. The following steps need to be taken to stop the criminal syndicates on their tracks:
1. Fire and replace the Manila International Airport Authority (MIAA) general manager Jose Angel Honrado.
Honrado is obviously no angel. If he had even an ounce of decency, he would have resigned immediately. But no, he was one of the people who initially denied there was a problem. He had been sleeping on the job. He seems surprised along with everybody else that there is a criminal syndicate operating at the NAIA. That goes to show he is ineffective as the head of MIAA.
One just has to ask, what the heck is BS Aquino waiting for and why is he so reluctant to fire his cousin Honrado? Yes, blood is thicker than water, but the country’s interests should come before personal interests. Honrado hasn’t made a difference in the operation at the airport even after years in his post. The scam has been going on for years but he wasn’t aware of it and, worse, he is still in denial about it. He needs to go.
The firing of Honrado will prove to the public that BS Aquino means business.  This can bring back the public’s confidence in airport security personnel.
2. Force all airport personnel to police one another by threatening them with loss of their jobs.
Did you ever have a teacher who threatened the whole class will be suspended or given failing marks if no one admitted to being the culprit of a bad deed? The same thing should be done with NAIA personnel.  The fastest way to solve the mystery of who is behind the criminal syndicate is to threaten the replacement of NAIA security personnel unless they come forward with what they know. It is time the innocent workers stop turning a blind eye to those who do the wrong thing.
This bullet-planting racket along with other rackets at NAIA thrives because there is no culture that encourages whistle-blowers to expose the culprits. People who want to do the right thing are probably scared of being branded as kill-joys or walang pakisama or feel like they have no one to turn to. Again, this goes back to item number one where the head of the airport authority is perceived as untrustworthy or not someone who will be on the side of those who speak out against criminal acitivities.
3. MIAA should encourage victims of scams to come forward and file complaints.
In light of the revelation that there is a criminal syndicate operating at the international airport, the airport authority should mobilize their help-desk and make themselves more visible. They have to show that they are there for the victims and facilitate in helping out explaining their rights and the procedures they have to go through in case they are found to be carrying illegal items in their bags. There is nothing worse than being accused of doing something you haven’t done and not knowing your rights as an individual. Criminals take advantage of ignorant passengers who would rather pay than go through the ordeal of legal proceedings.
If the Philippine government is serious about fixing the country’s image with the local and international community, they should be willing to invest in personnel who are professional and can be relied on to ease the burden of weary passengers who just want to get on their flights.
Finally, as a lot of people have pointed out, unless it is an illegal drug, small items that airport security personnel find and consider to be contraband should simply be thrown in the bin. After all, this is what most airport security personnel in a lot of countries do when they catch Filipinos bringing stuff not allowed like pulburon and other foodstuffs and trinkets into the country.  
A little common sense can solve this bullet-planting fiasco currently gripping the Philippines. It just takes resolve and commitment.