It’s hardly surprising that Filipinos are, on one hand, all indignant about the stubborn persistence of political dynasties while, on the other hand, themselves beholden to the family institution. Dynasties are natural wealth management systems just like any modern business enterprise. They are organised to ensure capital is held in a persistent and profitable structure and that the means to achieve and sustain that state of affairs are maintained.
So political dynasties, as social entities, essentially work towards
two goals: (1) hold wealth within the control of its members and (2)
secure that control.
Why do Filipinos need dynasties? Simple. Because the majority of Filipinos fail at managing wealth.
Look no further than capital entrusted to the management of public
institutions. The Philippines’ public transport systems, infrastructure,
and service agencies are all decrepit embarrassments. The way the jewel
of Metro Manila’s public transport system — its rail-based elevated
commuter trains — degenerated so rapidly over just a single presidential
term highlights just how inept Filipinos and their servants in
government are at keeping stuff neat, shiny, and running like clockwork.
In the hands of Filipino officials, the Philippines’ most cherished
holiday spots have become cesspools of human refuse within just two to
three decades.
Even an effort to seize property from traditional hacienderos
(colonial land owners) and redistribute these to farmers has been a
failure. Left to their devices, ordinary Filipinos “managing” their
doled-out assets spend their days drinking beer at the corner store.
Perhaps, then, Filipinos deserve to be stolen from by their own leaders — because the alleged “thieves” in the Philippine oligarchy have better, more profitable
ideas that could be applied to these assets. While most Filipinos lie
under the proverbial guava tree with mouths agape, enterprising
oligarchs invest in ladders.
Family-controlled companies remain the backbone of the capital base
of the Philippine economy. Indeed, they probably play a greater role in
keeping wealth within the Philippines’ borders than multinational
companies. Compare this to capital injected into the economy by the
“foreign investors” that “progressive” Filipinos salivate over. Filipino
workers toiling away in foreign-owned factories get paid a pittance for
their trouble making products that will eventually be sold back to them
for hundreds of times the value of their input into their manufacture.
A truly free market cannot force foreign business to re-invest their earnings in the Philippines. They will only do that if the Philippines is seen to be a viable re-investment
site that meets their numbers. If not, these foreign companies will
simply repatriate all of their profits back to their head offices in
North America, Western Europe, and Northeast Asia. The reality is, the
Philippines is not worth higher-level long-term investment. At best,
many foreign businesses looking at the Philippines invest in what
amounts to just a cash tube to dip into the Philippines’ massive (but
low per-capita value) consumer market to siphon as much OFW remittances
into their pockets as they could.
In that previous Juan Tamad example, they build the ladder to get the guava then take the fruit and the ladder with them back home. When they come back the next season, Juan is still there lying under the same tree with his mouth open, still waiting.
Philippine dynasties, on the other hand, are emotionally-invested in
the Philippines. They are Filipinos’ only shot at developing an economy
propped up by home-grown, indigenously-created capital. Their salvation
does not lie in spreading their legs to invite in foreign capitalists
and opening the floodgates to allow a deluge of cheap imported Chinese
trinkets. Thanks to the fatal victim mentality deeply-entrenched in
their psyches, Filipinos think they are entitled to a big chunk of the
profits these dynasties rake in. Unfortunately, people who can’t and won’t build ladders aren’t entitled to anything.
No comments:
Post a Comment