LEE KUAN YEW ON FILIPINOS AND THE PHILIPPINES

Source: http://antipinoy.com/lky_phil/

One of the best ways for us Filipinos to realize the Truth about ourselves and our country is to find out how people from other countries observe us and our society. This is best done when the one observing and describing us is an extremely well-informed and highly intelligent non-Filipino who has had his own fair share of problems similar to the ones that the Philippines has gone through (or is currently going through), and had a hand in actual problem-solving for his own country’s originally Philippines-like issues.

An example of such a person is Singaporean Minister Mentor and former Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew. Hailed as the Father of Modern Singapore, Lee Kuan Yew and his People’s Action Party were able to craft appropriate solutions for the issues and problems that were hounding Singapore early on in its history as a newly-independent Third World country with no natural resources, a huge number of uneducated people, and security problems resulting from the initial hostility of its neighbors towards it, among many other problems and managed to turn it into Southeast Asia’s oasis of prosperity and development and a First World hub within a region of what were then known as “Third World” countries.

The following excerpt which features Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew’s observations on the Philippines and of Filipinos should at least entice the readers of www.antipinoy.com to immediately pay a visit to the local Bookstore (those which specialize in real books – not school supplies!) and ask around for copies of the book from whence it came - “From Third World to First.”

Far from just being a book about Lee Kuan Yew or Singapore’s history of development, “From Third World to First” is also a collection of invaluable lessons in economic development, policy-making, international diplomacy, statecraft, domestic politics, history & culture, behavioural and cultural reform, meritocracy, the principles of pragmatic idealism, and examples of ingenious out-of-the-box thinking. In it, Lee Kuan Yew himself also describes how he and his team of technocrats were able to reform the culture, mindset, and behavior of a people who in the 1950’s were still predisposed to spitting in public and other unhygienic behavior as a result of carefully-planned behavioural-modification policies and systems which have turned Singapore into one of the cleanest and most orderly societies in Asia as well as well as the World.

This book can no doubt serve as a helpful handbook for any would-be leader of any Third World country looking to move into the First World.

I truly encourage all Filipinos who work in government, have an interest in government, or are looking for lessons on how to craft solutions to the problems of the Philippines to please buy a copy of this book. I assure everyone that “From Third World to First” will not just be eye-opening and enlightening, it will also enable Filipinos to understand that finding solutions to our problems is very possible if only we adopted a can-do attitude, a bias for intense learning and analysis, a solid framework for critical analysis and big-picture thinking, as well as a grounding in practical & creative out-of-the-box problem-solving.

If Singapore with Lee Kuan Yew and the People’s Action Party could do it, why can’t we?

* * *

(The following excerpt is taken from pages 299 – 305 from Lee Kuan Yew’s book “From Third World to First”, Chapter 18 “Building Ties with Thailand, the Philippines, and Brunei”)

*

The Philippines was a world apart from us, running a different style of politics and government under an American military umbrella. It was not until January 1974 that I visited President Marcos in Manila. When my Singapore Airlines plane flew into Philippine airspace, a small squadron of Philippine Air Force jet fighters escorted it to Manila Airport. There Marcos received me in great style – the Filipino way. I was put up at the guest wing of Malacañang Palace in lavishly furnished rooms, valuable objects of art bought in Europe strewn all over. Our hosts were gracious, extravagant in hospitality, flamboyant. Over a thousand miles of water separated us. There was no friction and little trade. We played golf, talked about the future of ASEAN, and promised to keep in touch.

His foreign minister, Carlos P. Romulo, was a small man of about five feet some 20 years my senior, with a ready wit and a self-deprecating manner about his size and other limitations. Romulo had a good sense of humor, an eloquent tongue, and a sharp pen, and was an excellent dinner companion because he was a wonderful raconteur, with a vast repertoire of anecdotes and witticisms. He did not hide his great admiration for the Americans. One of his favourite stories was about his return to the Philippines with General MacArthur. As MacArthur waded ashore at Leyte, the water reached his knees but came up to Romulo’s chest and he had to swim ashore. His good standing with ASEAN leaders and with Americans increased the prestige of the Marcos administration. Marcos had in Romulo a man of honor and integrity who helped give a gloss of respectability to his regime as it fell into disrepute in the 1980s.

In Bali in 1976, at the first ASEAN summit held after the fall of Saigon, I found Marcos keen to push for greater economic cooperation in ASEAN. But we could not go faster than the others. To set the pace, Marcos and I agreed to implement a bilateral Philippines-Singapore across-the-board 10 percent reduction of existing tariffs on all products and to promote intra-ASEAN trade. We also agreed to lay a Philippines-Singapore submarine cable. I was to discover that for him, the communiqué was the accomplishment itself; its implementation was secondary, an extra to be discussed at another conference.

We met every two to three years. He once took me on a tour of his library at Malacañang, its shelves filled with bound volumes of newspapers reporting his activities over the years since he first stood for elections. There were encyclopedia-size volumes on the history and culture of the Philippines with his name as the author. His campaign medals as an anti-Japanese guerrilla leader were displayed in glass cupboards. He was the undisputed boss of all Filipinos. Imelda, his wife, had a penchant for luxury and opulence. When they visited Singapore before the Bali summit they came in stye in two DC8’s, his and hers.

Marcos did not consider China a threat for the immediate future, unlike Japan. He did not rule out the possibility of an aggressive Japan, if circumstances changed. He had memories of the horrors the Imperial Army had inflicted on Manila. We had strongly divergent views on the Vietnamese invasion and occupation of Cambodia. While he, pro forma, condemned the Vietnamese occupation, he did not consider it a danger to the Philippines. There was the South China Sea separating them and the American navy guaranteed their security. As a result, Marcos was not active on the Cambodian question. Moreover, he was to become preoccupied with the deteriorating security in his country.

Marcos, ruling under martial law, had detained opposition leader Benigno (Ninoy) Aquino, reputed to be as charismatic and powerful a campaigner as he was. He freed Aquino and allowed him to go to the United States. As the economic situation in the Philippines deteriorated, Aquino announced his decision to return. Mrs. Marcos issued several veiled warnings. When the plane arrived at Manila Airport from Taipei in August 1983, he was shot as he descended from the aircraft. A whole posse of foreign correspondents with television camera crews accompanying him on the aircraft was not enough protection.

International outrage over the killing resulted in foreign banks stopping all loans to the Philippines, which owed over US$25 billion and could not pay the interest due. This brought Marcos to the crunch. He sent his minister for trade and industry, Bobby Ongpin, to ask me for a loan of US$300-500 million to meet the interest payments. I looked him straight in the eye and said, “We will never see that money back.” Moreover, I added, everyone knew that Marcos was seriously ill and under constant medication for a wasting disease. What was needed was a strong, healthy leader, not more loans.

Shortly afterward, in February 1984, Marcos met me in Brunei at the sultanate’s independence celebrations. He had undergone a dramatic physical change. Although less puffy than he had appeared on television, his complexion was dark as if he had been out in the sun. He was breathing hard as he spoke, his voice was soft, eyes bleary, and hair thinning. He looked most unhealthy. An ambulance with all the necessary equipment and a team of Filipino doctors were on standby outside his guest bungalow. Marcos spent much of the time giving me a most improbable story of how Aquino had been shot.

As soon as all our aides left, I went straight to the point, that no bank was going to lend him any money. They wanted to know who was going to succeed him if anything were to happen to him; all the bankers could see that he no longer looked healthy. Singapore banks had lent US$8 billion of the US$25 billion owing. The hard fact was they were not likely to get repayment for some 20 years. He countered that it would be only eight years. I said the bankers wanted to see a strong leader in the Philippines who could restore stability, and the Americans hoped the election in May would throw up someone who could be such a leader. I asked whom he would nominate for the election. He said Prime Minister Cesar Virata. I was blunt. Virata was a nonstarter, a first-class administrator but no political leader; further, his most politically astute colleague, defense minister Juan Ponce Enrile, was out of favour. Marcos was silent, then he admitted that succession was the nub of the problem. If he could find a successor, there would be a solution. As I left, he said, “You are a true friend.” I did not understand him. It was a strange meeting.

With medical care, Marcos dragged on. Cesar Virata met me in Singapore in January the following year. He was completely guileless, a political innocent. He said that Mrs. Imelda Marcos was likely to be nominated as the presidential candidate. I asked how that could be when there were other weighty candidates, including Juan Ponce Enrile and Blas Ople, the labor minister. Virata replied it had to do with “flow of money; she would have more money than other candidates to pay for the votes needed for nomination by the party and to win the election. He added that if she were the candidate, the opposition would put up Mrs. Cory Aquino and work up the people’s feelings. He said the economy was going down with no political stability.

The denouement came in February 1986 when Marcos held presidential elections which he claimed he won. Cory Aquino, the opposition candidate, disputed this and launched a civil disobedience campaign. Defense Minister Juan Enrile defected and admitted election fraud had taken place, and the head of the Philippine constabulary, Lieutenant General Fidel Ramos, joined him. A massive show of “people power” in the streets of Manila led to a spectacular overthrow of a dictatorship. The final indignity was on 25 February 1986, when Marcos and his wife fled in U.S. Air Force helicopters from Malacañang Palace to Clark Air Base and were flown to Hawaii. This Hollywood-style melodrama could only have happened in the Philippines.

Mrs. Aquino was sworn in as president amid jubilation. I had hopes that this honest, God-fearing woman would help regain confidence for the Philippines and get the country back on track. I visited her that June, three months after the event. She was a sincere, devout Catholic who wanted to do her best for her country by carrying out what she believed her husband would have done had he been alive, namely, restore democracy to the Philippines. Democracy would then solve their economic and social problems. At dinner, Mrs. Aquino seated the chairman of the constitutional commission, Chief Justice Cecilia Muñoz-Palma, next to me. I asked the learned lady what lessons her commission had learned from the experience of the last 40 years since independence in 1946 would guide her in drafting the constitution. She answered without hesitation, “We will not have any reservations or limitations on our democracy. We must make sure that no dictator can ever emerge to subvert the constitution.” Was there no incompatibility of the American-type separation of powers with the culture and habits of the Filipino people that had caused problems for the presidents before Marcos? Apparently none.

Endless attempted coups added to Mrs. Aquino’s problems. The army and the constabulary had been politicized. Before the ASEAN summit in December 1987, a coup was threatened. Without President Suharto’s firm support the summit would have been postponed and confidence in Aquino’s government undermined. The Philippine government agreed that the responsibility for security should be shared between them and the other ASEAN governments, in particular the Indonesian government. General Benny Moerdani, President Suharto’s trusted aide, took charge. He positioned an Indonesian warship in the middle of Manila Bay with helicopters and a commando team ready to rescue the ASEAN heads of government if there should be a coup attempt during the summit. I was included in their rescue plans. I wondered if such a rescue could work but decided to go along with the arrangements, hoping that the show of force would scare off the coup leaders. We were all confined to the Philippine Plaza Hotel by the seafront facing Manila Bay where we could see the Indonesian warship at anchor. The hotel was completely sealed off and guarded. The summit went off without any mishap. We all hoped that this show of united support for Mrs. Aquino’s government at a time when there were many attempts to destabilize it would calm the situation.

It made no difference. There were more coup attempts, discouraging investments badly needed to create jobs. This was a pity because they had so many able people, educated in the Philippines and the United States. Their workers were English-speaking, at least in Manila. There was no reason why the Philippines should not have been one of the more successful of the ASEAN countries. In the 1950s and 1960s, it was the most developed, because America had been generous in rehabilitating the country after the war. Something was missing, a gel to hold society together. The people at the top, the elite mestizos, had the same detached attitude to the native peasants as the mestizos in their haciendas in Latin America had toward their peons. They were two different societies: Those at the top lived a life of extreme luxury and comfort while the peasants scraped a living, and in the Philippines it was a hard living. They had no land but worked on sugar and coconut plantations. They had many children because the church discouraged birth control. The result was increasing poverty.

It was obvious that the Philippines would never take off unless there was substantial aid from the United States. George Shultz, the secretary of state, was sympathetic and wanted to help but made clear to me that the United States would be better able to do something if ASEAN showed support by making its contribution. The United States was reluctant to go it alone and adopt the Philippines as its special problem. Shultz wanted ASEAN to play a more prominent role to make it easier for the president to get the necessary votes in Congress. I persuaded Shultz to get the aid project off the ground in 1988, before President Reagan’s second term of office ended. He did. There were two meetings for a Multilateral Assistance Initiative (Philippines Assistance Programme): The first in Tokyo in 1989 brought US$3.5 billion in pledges, and the second in Hong Kong in 1991, under the Bush administration, yielded US$14 billion in pledges. But instability in the Philippines did not abate. This made donors hesitant and delayed the implementation of projects.

Mrs. Aquino’s successor, Fidel Ramos, whom she had backed, was more practical and established greater stability. In November 1992, I visited him. In a speech to the 18th Philippine Business Conference, I said, “I do not believe democracy necessarily leads to development. I believe what a country needs to develop is discipline more than democracy.” In private, President Ramos said he agreed with me that British parliamentary-type constitutions worked better because the majority party in the legislature was also the government. Publicly, Ramos had to differ.

He knew well the difficulties of trying to govern with strict American-style separation of powers. The senate had already defeated Mrs. Aquino’s proposal to retain the American bases. The Philippines had a rambunctious press but it did not check corruption. Individual press reporters could be bought, as could many judges. Something had gone seriously wrong. Millions of Filipino men and women had to leave their country for jobs abroad beneath their level of education. Filipino professionals whom we recruited to work in Singapore are as good as our own. Indeed, their architects, artists, and musicians are more artistic and creative than ours. Hundreds of thousands of them have left for Hawaii and for the American mainland. It is a problem the solution to which has not been made easier by the workings of a Philippine version of the American constitution.

The difference lies in the culture of the Filipino people. It is a soft, forgiving culture. Only in the Philippines could a leader like Ferdinand Marcos, who pillaged his country for over 20 years, still be considered for a national burial. Insignificant amounts of the loot have been recovered, yet his wife and children were allowed to return and engage in politics. They supported the winning presidential and congressional candidates with their considerable resources and reappeared in the political and social limelight after the 1998 election that returned President Joseph Estrada. General Fabian Ver, Marcos’s commander-in-chief who had been in charge of security when Aquino was assassinated, had fled the Philippines together with Marcos in 1986. When he died in Bangkok, the Estrada government gave the general military honors at his burial. One Filipino newspaper, Today, wrote on 22 November 1998, “Ver, Marcos and the rest of the official family plunged the country into two decades of lies, torture, and plunder. Over the next decade, Marcos’s cronies and immediate family would tiptoe back into the country, one by one – always to the public’s revulsion and disgust, though they showed that there was nothing that hidden money and thick hides could not withstand.” Some Filipinos write and speak with passion. If they could get their elite to share their sentiments and act, what could they not have achieved?

*

President Noynoy Aquino and everyone in his cabinet and staff (all secretaries down to the director level) should all get copies of “From Third World to First” and read the book at least twice.

* * *

Lee Kuan Yew’s Profile:

Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew (Hakka for李光耀 – Lî Guang Yào in Mandarin) born “Harry Lee Kuan Yew” and known simply as “Harry” to close friends, family, and his late wife, was born in Singapore on September 16, 1923, a third-generation descendant of immigrants from the Hakka dialect-group hailing from China’s Guangdong Province. He finished law at Cambridge University, England. In 1954, he formed the People’s Action Party, which won the first Singapore general election five years later. Though dominantly English-speaking and fluent in Malay, but originally unable to competently converse in Mandarin or other Chinese dialects, he decided at an advanced age to exert intense effort to learn Mandarin and later Hokkien, because he needed both for political campaigns at the grassroots level. He also changed his public persona from being a British-educated British-accented upper-class Anglophile named “Harry Lee” to being known in public and in the papers as “Lee Kuan Yew.”

Lee Kuan Yew became Singapore’s first prime minister in 1959, at the age of thirty-five and quickly developed Singapore’s economy through the aggressive invitation of foreign Multinational Corporations by avoiding economic protectionism and creating a business-friendly environment in order to concentrate on the immediate task of job creation for the ordinary citizens. In November 1990, he resigned the office to assume the advisory post of Senior Minister in the Singapore Cabinet and in 2004, took on the title of the “emeritus” role of Minister Mentor when his successor as Prime Minister, Goh Chok Tong (吳作棟) became Senior Minister after Goh resigned the premiership.

PM Lee Hsien Loong

Lee Kuan Yew’s son, Lee Hsien-Loong (李顯龍) now serves as Singapore’s Prime Minister after so many years of being given the most difficult and challenging of job assignments, proving himself academically superior to his peers at school, and needing to prove his worth purely through merit by rising up through the ranks in both the military and the civil service (he became a Brigadier-General), and not because he is the son of Lee Kuan Yew.

About the Author

Orion has written 8 stories on this site.

Orion Pérez Dumdum comes from an IT background and analyzes systems the way they should be: logically and objectively.

Being Cebuano (half-Cebuano, half-Tagalog), and having lived in Cebu, he is a staunch supporter of Federalism.

Having lived in progressive countries which use parliamentary systems, Orion has seen first hand the difference in the quality of discussions and debates of both systems, finding that while discussions in the Philippines are mostly filled with polemical sophistry often focused on trivial and petty concerns, discussions and debates in the Parliamentary-based countries he’s lived in have often focused on the most practical and most important points.

Having experienced OFW-life himself, he has seen firsthand how the dearth of investment – both local and foreign – is the cause of the high unemployment and underemployment that exists in the Philippines as well as the low salaries earned by people who do have jobs.

He is one of the founding members of Get Real Philippines and hosts the Sentro ng Katotohanan political commentary show which airs on Tuesdays and Thursday on DWBL 1242kHz from 8:30pm to 9:30pm.

If you think Orion looks familiar… He most probably is.

21 comments

This entry was tagged with: Philippine Government, Philippine Politics

More like this:

Quo vadis, Jojo?

Another crooked turn in “daang matuwid”

Aquino insults murdered journalists

21 Responses. Have your say.

Vicente Calibo de Jesus says:

January 11, 2011 at 5:48 am

My wife and I have just been to Singapore, from Dec. 27, 2010 to Jan. 2, 2011. That country has

done wonders. The physical transformation of the place is a reflection of the vision of Lee Kuan

Yew, his associates and the Singaporean people.

What was saddening was the fact the Philippines was ahead of Singapore in the 50s and early 60s. Our leaders and the ruling class failed to make changes that would have lifted the people

towards modernization.

It’s not too late. Maybe PNoy and his associates can yet do something that would set our direction to the right path.

Reply

avital guimaraiz says:

April 25, 2012 at 2:00 am

Pnoy has assigned himself an almost impossible task — to curb corruption in the most corrupt country in Asia, mostly because this country insists on not curving a runaway population growth. Ask any abused Filipino overseas worker why he/she hangs on to a despicable job. It is to help his/her parents and siblings. How many siblings? 6, 7, 8, a dozen. Still many ill-intentioned politicians and a horde of Catholic spokesmen of God insists this almost hundred million barely educated, sickly, unemployed or underemployed citizens are the country’s ‘strength’! 5 babies born every minute. Nearly all of them destined to grow up malnourished, ignorant and easy to get robbed blind by the leaders to whom they sell their votes, if they grow up at all. It is unfair for Filipinos to keep hoping their government can do something about their wretched situation. They should rally to get that RHbill passed so the next generation will be less likely to breed like rats and live like rats. If they don’t they will, sooner rather than later, run out of food, money, land to live on, water, even air. And they will all drown in the garbage they produce as they consume more than they grow.

Reply

Badbeat17 says:

April 25, 2012 at 7:54 pm

I hope all Filipinos read this comment made by avital guimaraiz which is very well written.Shame on you Philippines,that your country is such a sick country with no future for the Children’s and for the weak. I’m surprise to know that your country have one of the largest Catholic population,which all teachings of this religion is ignored by almost every politicians.I guess everything is forgiven by just going to a confession every Sunday Whether Sins committed are MORTAL.

Reply

ROMAN RAMA GUERRERO says:

January 11, 2011 at 7:19 pm

I think PNoy and his associates should better look closely at the revival of Chacha purportedly through a Constitutional Convention(ConCon). A bill calling for election of delegates to said ConCon is already filed which could be a decoy or diversion to the possible sudden resurrection of HR 1109 which approved the convening of a Constituent Assembly(ConAss) without the 3/4 separate vote of Senate participation.

Likewise, PNoy and his associates should look closely at the sudden increases of prices of basic goods and services which certainly would alienate people’s support to the point that the previous administration becomes “better looking” to the people. These price increases augurs well to a possible plot to discredit PNoy into an incompetent and ineffective leader fit to be relegated as figurehead President Head of State while the plotters assume the power to govern in a parliamentary form of government with a Prime Minister as Head of government without term limit. Did I say the previous President may have a hand on these?

Reply

Elias de la Cruz says:

January 15, 2011 at 12:22 am

eh Pucha!!… San damak mak ba naman na lason at bobong politiko ung iboto natin.. tingin mu ba author may pag-asa pa? wag mung paasahin ung Filipino hangga’t nariyan ung mga yan.. lalo na ung mga Trapo. Ung Trapo ang tunay na canser. Ang tanong paano ba ginagamot ung canser? dapat yan ung talakayin mu ng diretso. Sana rin lang wag mu kaming gawing parang hindi nakatira sa pilipinas.

Reply

Gerald Froebe says:

February 9, 2011 at 9:17 pm

I’ve been absent for a while, but now I remember why I used to love this website. Thanks , I’ll try and check back more often. How frequently you update your site? – Elegant London Escorts, 65-67 Brewer Street, Floor: 2, London W1F 9UP. Phone: 020 3011 2941

Reply

Rommel says:

April 26, 2011 at 12:28 am

Lee Kuan Yew once insinuated that he and Marcos were of the same breed and character. The only difference was, they lead a totally different set of people.

Reply

malou says:

April 26, 2011 at 12:30 am

I heard so many positive remarks about Singapore, the country itself. Truly it is run by great people with great dedication of service & excellence. I just hope, our country, the Philippines will somehow be awaken to the truth that we have a good future in our own hands. First, there should be a total cleansing in the government. Being a public servant here is a profession that would promise you a life of a king. If you want to own a house here and at the posh villages abroad, be a public servant. If you want a strong voice in the society even your opinion is of out of context, be a public servant. That is how most of the people in our government act. Personally, I am not a voter of my own country. Sad to say this, I do not believe in our government. There are choosen few who are good leaders but most of them has each own agenda why they run for that particular public office. As a citizen of my country, I do small projects in the my Parish Church and in my community as well to be of service to some needy Filipinos who are at my reach. In this small act of kindness, I may multiply that deed when others saw and felt the love that I have shared.

Reply

Jojo says:

April 26, 2011 at 12:56 am

did lee kuan yew legalized Abortion during his time to control the population in Singapore?

i think during his time he controls everything to achieve the prosperity of Singapore today, Its a small country , the Philippines is a big country with islands separated us, i think if he is the prime minister of our country during his time he cant hardly do it..

Reply

kabayani gerry says:

April 26, 2011 at 3:11 am

no more trapo. may p[ag asa. malaki ang pag-asa. we are part of the solution.

Reply

Allan says:

April 23, 2012 at 6:13 pm

A lot of folks say LKY was a great leader. I disagree most strongly, as much as I disagree at this author’s fanboy view that we can learn so much from him. Jojo is right: there is no comparison between SG and PH. Singapore is such a small country. If its leader can’t make it work, then he has an IQ of a newt.

Reply

Idan says:

April 24, 2012 at 5:10 am

hi mr orion i remember u.. u were a contestant of BOTB during the 90s and i think u went till finals or semis..kudos to u

Reply

green says:

April 13, 2013 at 7:44 am

It’s not impossible to attain economic success in PH. All you have to do people is start it from yourselves. The number one problem I see with Filipino individuals is being undisciplined. Sa traffic pa lang makikita mo na eh, lagging may karera sa kalsada. mgdistansya ka lng ng isang dipa sa sinusundan mong sasakyan, masisingitan ka na. Another example is at fast foods. Not only the food are being taken out, pati ba Spoons and Forks? Paano uunlad ang negosyo ng nyan. And there are so many examples that shows other Filipino’s are doing wrong in just simple daily things. How much more in cases that involve big money? Don’t just blame everything to the Government. yes, there are corrupt people in there, but you can help kick them out by not voting them. If you’re doing it correctly by yourself, you can help PH become the richest nation in Asia. If want PH to grew, start it from yourself!

Reply

Jan Mikhail M. Gaid says:

August 23, 2014 at 1:33 am

That, my friend, is called liberalism. John Stuart Mill is behind that idea.

Reply

Domingo Ayso says:

May 29, 2013 at 4:59 am

Will all your knowledge is right. But the most import for us, is to respect each other right, and no blaming, each other’s who is right? I think the most important is to do what is right and help our country by not blaming to anyone else. God bless you all

Reply

Lolita says:

May 30, 2013 at 3:03 pm

Sana Lang as Panahon ni Pnoy…magkaroon ng pagbabago. Honest siya at mahal niya ang mga Pinoy. Bilang isang mamamayang Pilipino, sana matuto tayong tulungan ang ating bayan at tangkilikin ang sarili hating Gawa.

Reply

Serge Guillaume says:

September 21, 2013 at 8:50 am

I’ll definitely read LKY’s book. I could comment pages on this excerpt. But Orion Pérez Dumdum has it completely wrong: The Philippines cannot be compared to Singapore. And actually cannot be compared to any country in Asia. It can be compared to Latin American countries that are, as the Philippines, catholic, former colonies of Spain or Portugal and under strong cultural US influence. This history has shaped Filipino present culture, in the broadest sense. As an example, as I have over and over argued, corruption is NOT the problem. There is corruption in each and every country in Asia. I know it first hand over my 20 years experience in the region dealing with several governments. Corruption (and not petty one!) has not prevented Thailand, Malaysia, SINGAPORE, Vietnam, Indonesia to mention a few to develop at a much faster pace than the Philippines. The problem is deeply cultural. I could not mention all the elements, socio psychological, that govern Filipino behavior. This is still something I am studying and thinking over. I believe I know some. One is that contrary to a widely spread belief that Filipinos are not individualistic, they actually are (the concept extends of course to the family or the clan but NOT TO THE NATION) and therefore pursue above all individualistic interests, and short term ones for that matter. Exactly the opposite of Chinese, Vietnamese or Thai who of course also strive for their own interests but deep inside understand that the whole is greater than the sum of its parts while in the Philippines it would appear that it is exactly the opposite. Singing the national anthem at every beauty contest or award celebration does not symbolize a national culture. In the Filipino case it symbolizes a very high sense of acting and parade. The fact that educated Filipino have left the country, which continues to be described as a great achievement as it fuels the development of the country but is actually her catastrophic problem, AND DO NOT RETURN, clearly supports this argument. I witnessed the return of thousands of Viet Kieus in the early 90′s in Vietnam when the Vietnamese authorities decided to reform the economy; they played a crucial role in the phenomenal development of Vietnam in the last 20 years. Again, despite some brilliant highly educated elite, who understand what is happening here in the Philippines, things are not in my opinion taking the right turn. The problem is deeply cultural and LKY may well have a point, that he has made over and over again also for self serving purposes, when he supports that US type democracy might not be the best system for the Philippines. But then… what?

Reply

luzminda penaranda says:

October 9, 2013 at 7:53 pm

Orion, maganda ang story and opinion ni Lee Kuan Yew. Talagang nakakalungkot na tayong mga Pilipino na tinaguriang the Catholic in Asia ay ganyan ang ginagawa. Marahil kasi ang mga mayayaman, makapangyarihan at may sinasabi sa puwesto at kalakalan ay mas inuuna ang sarili keysa sa kabutihan ng higit na mas nakararami. Minsan makikita mo na mas pinagpala ang mga taong gumagawa ng pagnanakaw sa pamahalaan keysa sa mga taong nagpapakahirap sa trabaho at naniniwala at nagsasabuhay ng salita ng Diyos. Ngunit may katapusan din ang lahat ng mga taong nagpasasa na sa bagay na materyal lalong lalo na dito sa bayang Pilipinas. At kung gusto ninyo makita ang kabutihan ng Diyos…matagal na na inihanda ng Diyos ang bayan, unang-una na ng gawin ni Marcos na Parliamentary government ang bansa nuong early 70′s. Pinayagan ng Diyos ang pag-upo ni Cory Aquino para makita ninyo ang klase ng pamumuno ng mga mayayaman at walang karanasan sa pulitika na ang tanging sandata ay ang pagiging Katoliko, ngunit gawain naman at taliwas sa tunay na pangaral ni Kristo. Nakita ko sa kanya ang “paghihiganti” sa halip na pagtulong sa pagbangon ng bayan. Sumunod na pagliligtas at paghahanda ng Diyos sa bayan ay nang pasamahin Niya ang mga tinaguriang “sira ang ulo na mga kandidato – panggulo” kung saan ang “Ispiritual government” ang nilalayon para magkaroon ng kaayusan ang bayan…ngunit walang naniwala, patuloy pa rin ang pandaraya sa eleksiyon ng mga ganid sa puwesto na pera ang ginamit para manatili sa puwesto. Muli ay nangusap ang Diyos sa bayan nuong 2004 election at ipinasabi ang gusto Niya sa bayang pinili…I am calling for a Divine government to be run under a Parliamentary System. Dumating ang Year of Faith at isinagawa ko ang paglalahad sa bayan sa pamamagitan ng mga mensahe ko na ispiritual at katotohanan. Nagbigay ako ng warning kay Pres. Noynoy Aquino nang pirmahan niya ng palihim ang RH Bill na masusumpungan niya ang Kamay ng Diyos kapag ginawa niya ang pagapprove ng RH Bill. Matatapos na ang Year of Faith at hinihintay ko ang pagkilos ng kapangyarihan ng Diyos para sa Bayan, para turuan ng leksiyon ang mga taong nagpasasa sa yaman ng bayan, nagpahirap sa mga pilipinong mahirap na nagdulot ng pagkakahi-hiwalay at gagawin ko iyon kasama ang kapangyarihan ng kalikasan na ipakikita ng Diyos sa bayan para maniwala sila na ako ang pinili ng Diyos na itama ang matagal na buhay sa kamalian, ibangon ang bayan sa pagkakalugmok at ipakilala ang Diyos na Banal sa pamamagitan ng isang Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church sa ngalan ng Espiritu at katotohanan dahil ang bayan at simbahan ay iisa lamang at lahat ng mga nanunungkulan at gustong manungkulan ay dapat naayon sa gawaing may katapatan at kabanalan para mailigtas ang bayan sa kapahamakan. Ito ang hamon ko sa lahat ng gustong maglingkod tungo sa kaligtasan ng isang bansa at kung sino man ang handang tumulong sa pagbangon ng bayan ay aking tatanggapin para maglingkod ng buong tapat at may pagmamahal. Ang wala sa mga taong naglilingkod ngayon ay PAGMAMAHAL SA DIYOS-BAYAN AT TAO…kaya tayo ay naghihirap at namumuhay sa kahirapan…Kelan tayo Gigising…kapag nakakita lang tayo ng MILAGRO galing sa kalangitan at iyan ang aking MITHIIN at LAYUNIN, kahit ako ay nag-iisa lang…dahil kasama ko ang DIYOS sa aking gawain at walang IMPOSIBLE kapag kasama mo ang Diyos. Kaya sinasabi ko hindi mo kailangang manggaya dahil matagal na itong inihanda ng Diyos para sa bayang Pilipinas, bayang pinili, minahal at itinangi ng Diyos ang bayang ipinangalan sa akin…Luzviminda

Reply

Cockroachman says:

December 24, 2013 at 10:38 pm

LKY did a great job in promoting good side of Singapore while hiding a bad one. For example, if you been to Singapore, try to travel outskirts then you will see no different on Singapore cleanness from other SEA countries. A bit drier, I’d say.

While other ASEAN countries applaude Singapore on her economy, suggest to relook on political and freedom of people. Such a great effort as a leader to run an almost single political party country. I don’t dislike the guy though.

Reply

Vern's says:

December 30, 2013 at 10:21 am

I can agree to some of what the author wrote here but not at all don’t make it sound as if we don’t live in Philippines and we don’t know our Philippines history . We as Filipinos opened our eyes and also knows how to see every leaders achievements. We can’t compare Singapore and Philippines too Singapore only consist of 4 million people or more while Philippines population is 100 millions or more if LKY can’t handle a small nation then something is wrong somewhere. he is a great leader I admire him and salute him for that but Marcos was a great leader too he has the most achievements among all the presidents who rule the country

Reply

Vern's says:

December 30, 2013 at 10:26 am

And u are saying that Marcos was corrupt huh!! Imelda Marcos was acquitted in all 986 cases filled against them on her 60th birthday 

Reply

Join the discussion

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Name *

Email *

Website

Comment