Saturday, November 30, 2019
Matthew 4:18-22 | Duccio | Jesus calling Peter and Andrew
| ||||||||||||||
|
Friday, November 29, 2019
Human Trafficking, the Most Evil Enslavement
Fr. Shay Cullen
29 November 2019
Human trafficking for sexual exploitation is the most insidious and evil form of enslavement. That is because it is so personal and inflicts such human degradation and suffering on individuals day after day, year by year. It is one of the most serious kinds of human rights violations.
Earlier this year, twenty six teenagers aged 14 to 17 were rescued from the Golden Victory Hotel and the Villa Luli and Inev Resort in Mabalacat City near Angeles City by the Women and Children Protection Center of the Philippine National Police (PNP) based in Camp Crame headed by General William Macavinta. The children were victims of human trafficking and sexual exploitation by the traffickers and hotel operators and foreign and local sex tourists. The children were rescued and twenty of the victims were brought to the Preda Foundation’s home for trafficked girls. They were traumatized and conditioned by relatives and traffickers to work as sexually exploited children.
It is very important that we all understand what is going on in Asia and the world where human traffickers are vicious criminals. They are enslaving women and children in the sex trade and making them work long hours satisfying the lust and devious sexual fantasies of immoral men for little or no money. They control and virtually imprison the victims by threats and intimidation. Many are lured from poor villages and remote towns to the sex industry in cities and sold into sex bars where they are held in debt bondage. They are afraid to leave with unpaid debts for board and lodging and drugs.
That is what is insidious about the crime of human trafficking. It is a life-long bondage and control, the victims are condemned to suffer a life of sexual violence. The sex abusers, foreign or local, can rape and abuse with impunity. The young women and children are afraid to complain or run away. They are drug dependent and have debts to the drug pushers. If only President Duterte would crack down on the pushers and drug peddlers inside the sex bars and brothels that run on mayor’s permits and that enslave our young people, it would be a great act of statesmanship.
In today’s world, slavery is common. In every country, there are enslaved people. Most of 24.5 million victims are women and 33 percent are children. They are almost always very poor, unemployed, not well educated and vulnerable. They are victims of organized crime syndicates and used for forced labor or underpaid work that includes working in factories, on fishing vessels and as farm laborers or held in sexual enslavement.
Other victims of human trafficking in Europe are refugees, asylum seekers and migrants fleeing poverty and violence. The exploitation and abuse of these people happens in migrant reception centers and refugee camps on the doorsteps of Europe. Many of them and their families are ruined by war and having sold their land and property to speculators and paid traffickers to get them to Europe, many more borrowed money and are in debt bondage to traffickers. They will have to pay the traffickers and end up enslaved for dozens of years. Along the trafficking journey, hundreds of minors have been sexually exploited. It is part of their survival and out of shame and fear they almost never report it or admit it happens. As many as 33, 000 migrants have died while trying to enter Europe between 2000 and 2017 and many more since then. It is a present ongoing crime by human traffickers.
According to Emmaus International, after the arms and drug trade, human trafficking is the third most lucrative and widespread form of criminal activity and exploitation. It generates 32 billion euros a year. Every year, around 2.5 million new victims – mainly women and children – are recruited and exploited worldwide.
It is not all doom and gloom. Many are fighting back and confronting the evil trade in humans. More and more traffickers are being brought to justice and some are convicted. Much more needs to be done.
Those twenty minors rescued from the sex industry in Mabalacat and brought to the Preda Foundation home for abused children are recovering and have broken out of their “enslaved mentality.” That is the conditioning whereby they are made to believe that they are good for nothing other than drug dependent sex workers. Now, they feel free and have a new enlightened outlook on themselves and their future. This is due to the “Anger and Pain Release Therapy” that they choose to have several times a week at the Preda home. The therapist encourages them to challenge and confront those people, the traffickers and abusers who hurt, humiliated and abused them. The teenagers are urged to release their pent up buried feelings of hurt emotions of anger and frustration at them. In the session, the girls began shouting out their anger and pain and even hatred erupted as some screamed as they punched the cushions. In their imagination, they were punching their abuser and tormentor.
After weeks of this, with support, counseling, comfort and encouragement from the all female staff, the teenagers began to recover and change. They grew in self-confidence and self esteem. The positive reinforcement therapy built up their self-image as good persons with rights and power to get justice. They became involved in all the games, sports, group dynamics and learning activities. From sad, angry, withdrawn children, they stood up empowered and confronted the world and their traffickers and abusers. It helps them overcome their feelings of weakness, defeat, and fear. From depression and withdrawal, they open and emerge empowered victors pursuing justice robustly with determination and vigor.
They are attending court hearings and testifying with courage and determination. It is only when the victims are rescued, protected, healed and testify against the traffickers and abusers will the scourge of human trafficking for sexual exploitation end.
Read the book by the same author, Ricky and Julie at http://amzn.com/B07DXKX4SV
Why “journalism” will NEVER be the right channel for delivering reliable FACTS
- by benign0 - 3 Comments.
https://www.getrealphilippines.com/2019/11/why-journalism-will-never-be-the-right-channel-for-delivering-reliable-facts/
If people think imposing more controls on social media will change the fortunes of Big Traditional Corporate News Media, they’ll likely be in for a shock. The truth about “journalism” is that it is a profession that relies on a rather primitive aspect of the human condition — emotionalism. “Journalists” are in constant search of a story to tell. By their very nature, stories are designed to appeal to an old quirk of human cognition that favours a linear episodal revealing of information which is how a story is structured — it has a beginning and an end and, between these two points, a rising action phase peaking at a climax then a falling action leading to resolution.
Because “journalism” relies on stories to structure the information it delivers, it will never be up to the task of being a conduit for factual information. Factual information presented in non-linear structures like tables, matrices, and multi-variable logical constructs are boring. This is the reason facts never fly as news stories and, therefore, hardly ever make front page headlines in newspapers and why dictionaries, almanacs, and phone directories are not read from cover-to-cover.
In short, we should all disabuse ourselves of the notion that “journalism” will save humanity from the “fake news” and “disinformation” that leaders of that profession insist proliferate on the Net and turn people into sheep and zombies. This does not mean that “fake news” and “disinformation” are not problems. They are and they are serious ones. However, “journalism” is not the “weapon” it is made out to be that can combat “fake news” and “disinformation”.
In the important fight we face against disinformation, “journalism” is a dull weapon. To become savvier at consuming and vetting information, we need to get on top of our bias towards stories. Stories are a cognitive relic we inherited from our ancestors whose historical and cultural traditions are stored in various story structures — epics, legends, and religious scripture, to name a few. “Journalism”, therefore, does not contribute to this much-needed cognitive leap because, for all intents and purposes, it is part of the problem its practioners presume to solve.
Consider this. The headline “Plane Crash kills 250” is a story that sends chills up frequent fliers’ spines and actually prompts many to think twice about their next overseas holiday. But the fact that your chances of being killed in a plane crash over a lifetime of flying is far smaller than the probability of you being run over while crossing a street elicits far less of such an emotional response and, often, does not change one’s perception of flying. On one hand, we don’t think much about taking unecessary risks on our streets everyday — jaywalking, trying to beat a red light, tailgating, counterflowing, etc. — but, on the other, raise a shrill howl at the slightest perception that even the smallest of safety procedures are not observed on a flight. That’s all because stories about plane crashes make headline news and movie plots whereas the dramas of driving and crossing streets don’t sell papers and movie tickets.
“Journalism” fills the gap between working at getting hold of reliable facts and our predisposition to sitting wide-eyed while an “elder” spoonfeeds us our daily-dose of knowledge delivered via stories. It’s a comfy service that puts the ability to poison minds at a massive scale in the hands of a tiny elite community of oligarchs. That obvious fact about the “journalism” profession and the “news” media industry that employs these professionals seems to escape the mind of most people.
Journalists may be made out to be some sort of hero or messiah under the current thinking. The “fight” against “disinformation” provides a good narrative to enforce that flawed notion about “journalists”. People need to step up and put in a bit more brain work into piecing together their own frame of thinking and not rely on the mere stories that they are told. The “journalism” profession and the news media industry make their money from telling people stories. We had, for so long, willingly submitted to the monopoly “journalists” and news media businesses hold on story telling. It is high time we broke that monopoly and, more importantly, get over our dependence on stories and narratives as our primary source of information.
Journalism still has its place — as a form of entertainment. But we are now in an era where reliable information is available and can be obtained independently with a bit of work and a bit more robust thinking.
About benign0
benign0 is the Webmaster of GetRealPhilippines.com.
https://www.getrealphilippines.com/2019/11/why-journalism-will-never-be-the-right-channel-for-delivering-reliable-facts/
Luke 21:29-33 | Asako Kuwajima | The bud of a tree is a sign
| ||||||||||||||
|
Thursday, November 28, 2019
Luke 21:20-28 | Nasa Space Photo | Signs in the sun and moon and stars
| ||||||||||||||
|
Wednesday, November 27, 2019
Sick and tired of blah-blah by, and on, Robredo
By Rigoberto D. Tiglao
November 27, 2019
I’M sick and tried of all the blah-blah by, and on, Vice President Maria Leonor Robredo these past three years. As vice president, she has accomplished nothing and said nothing really substantial or reasonable. Why the heck do we spend time talking about her?
To be honest, this column is obviously another such blah-blah on Robredo, but what I can do when media has been over-reporting her? C’mon, what’s really the news value justifying banner headlines yesterday reporting Robredo’s inane remarks like, “I have only started” (The Manila Times and Philippine Star) and “Leni to DU30: What are you scared of?” (Philippine Daily Inquirer). (To save this column from being another total blah-blah, I raise later below issues confronting the war against drugs I hope government will consider.)
After three years of bashing Duterte and painting the country, in the words of her cheerleader Maria Ressa, a “war zone” where corpses by the President’s death squads litter the streets, she is still “starting”? Then that mindless question by Robredo asking if Duterte is scared is big news deserving banner treatment?
I dare to lecture my media colleagues: Banner headlines are for, to exaggerate it, earth-shaking events, or statements by people who have some kind of power to walk the talk. If, say, in the context of hypothetical news that some stupid UN human rights group comes out with a report condemning alleged extrajudicial killings in the Philippines, Duterte says, “I have just started,” that is big, fearful news. He has the authority and resources to walk his talk.
But a vice president with no political power, and obviously not enough brains, mouthing a sound bite?
Superiority
After three years, Robredo has done nothing meaningful for any journalist to take seriously what she is saying. The Manila Bulletin, which many journalists in the past ridicule as a kind of staid paper that would have as a banner headline “Holiday season begins,” demonstrated its journalistic superiority, by having as its banner “DoT takes over SEAG billeting.” It had as its second major story though Robredo’s threatening claim, certainly a newsworthy statement: “I will reveal what I have uncovered about war on drugs.”
Robredo has done nothing to help the country in its anti-illegal drugs campaign, and in her three weeks as vice chairman of the Inter-agency Committee on the Anti-Illegal Drugs she doesn’t have any constructive criticism nor proposal for the country to end the proliferation of illegal drugs — except to end the campaign.
An anti-drug war by any government is so difficult and complicated that there is no sure formula, no detailed template to undertake it. If Robredo didn’t have any authority, she should have focused on studying what such a war requires on ground level. After all, she not only has staff with a P700 million per year budget, but the pink organization Akbayan, from which she recruited her spokesman Barry Guiterrez.
I give one example of an aspect of the anti-drug war that needs to be studied.
180,000
What has happened to the roughly 180,000 “drug personalities” whom the police and the Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency (PDEA) reported they arrested since the campaign started up to March 2019.
If they are still in prison awaiting trial or have been convicted, that means that our prison population, which was at 140,000 in 2016, has doubled. While there have been reports that our prisons have been so crowded that there has been horrific inhuman conditions there, I don’t think our prison population now totals 320,000.
Indeed, the Commission on Audit reported that for 2018, the country’s prison population totals 136,314, which means a decrease from the 140,000 level in 2016.
This data points to very serious issues in the anti-drug war.
First, with so many people because of the intense police and PDEA campaigns, has government done anything substantial to enlarge prison facilities? If there hasn’t been any substantial growth in our facilities, the anti-drug war would be transforming a huge number of people kept in extremely congested prisons into hardcore criminals who would be released to society three or four years down the road.
Justice system
Second, with the intensity and success of the anti-drug war, how has our obviously inefficient justice system coped with such a drastic increase in the cases it has to decide? With so many people being arrested for possessing or selling illegal drugs, it is a no-brainer for Congress or the Supreme Court to create special, 24-hour courts dealing only with illegal-drug cases.
The third issue is related to the second and is extremely worrying.
A huge number of the 180,000 drug personalities arrested since 2016, from my anecdotal evidence, have been released to their relatives or their drug lords, with bail bonds as low as P10,000. In the jail in the town where I live, most of the “drug personalities” arrested from 2016 to 2018 have been released on bail, with only the poor souls with no relatives nor drug lords to post remaining there.
Reports from the ground claim that the police are worried and getting tired of this situation. In many cases, those arrested simply return to their illegal trade, making it a Sisyphus kind of toil for the police, arresting the same people in their area again and again.
Worse, the police have become anxious that those they have arrested and were freed on bail would get back at them, and even their relatives. The police response that hasn’t been good for the campaign is first, they pull back on the campaign, claiming to their superiors that they have already arrested and filed charges against a huge number of people in their areas, and their cases are not just up to the courts.
Alarming
The second police response is certainly alarming and is right down Robredo and her ilk’s alley. Tired of seeing those whom they arrested freed on bail and returning to their horrid business, or/and afraid these criminals would retaliate, the police execute them the next time they are arrested. And the police see their deed as necessary, quick justice, which human rights crusaders labeling these as “extrajudicial killings (EJKs).”
The numbers are worrying. Three years after it started, Duterte’s war on drugs has resulted in 180,000 arrested as of March. I suspect many of these have been freed on bail. Have they returned to their illegal trade? Either we will see a surge of EJKs, or a resurgence of the drug trade.
But really, I am just guessing, as we don’t really have hard data on how many “drug personalities” are being released on bail, how many are re-arrested, how many are killed the second or third time they are arrested.
But these are the kinds of research Robredo, the Yellows, and those holier-than-thou human rights groups should have been doing in the past three years instead of blabbering inanities.
But they haven’t. I suspect that in their hearts, they are hoping the extrajudicial killings would increase, as it has been their propaganda tack to topple Duterte.
Email: tiglao.manilatimes@gmail.com
Facebook: Rigoberto Tiglao
Twitter: @bobitiglao
Book orders: www.rigobertotiglao.com/debunked
https://www.manilatimes.net/2019/11/27/opinion/columnists/topanalysis/sick-and-tired-of-blah-blah-by-and-on-robredo/659122/
Luke 21:12-19 | Cesare Fracanzano | Men will seize you and persecute you
| ||||||||||||||
|
Tuesday, November 26, 2019
Luke 21:5-11 | Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Paris | Time will come when not a single stone will be left
| ||||||||||||||
|
Monday, November 25, 2019
Firing of Leni Robredo as “Drug Czar” is the final nail in the Liberal Party coffin
- by Ilda - 2 Comments.
Things have been moving too fast in Philippine politics lately that it’s hard to keep up. I have been promising myself I would write about current Vice President Leonor “Leni” Robredo’s relentless attacks on the government – a government she is a part of, but before I had a chance to do it, President Rodrigo Duterte offered her a post as co-chair of his anti-drug body Inter-Agency Committe on Anti-Illegal Drugs (ICAD). I also wanted to write about that. Then she accepted it. Before I could write about that too, two weeks later, she got fired!
The news of Robredo getting sacked was reported around the globe. It’s one of the worst things that can happen to anyone. It’s the mother of all embarrassing situations for a politician. This is the second time Robredo had been fired from Duterte’s cabinet. It would be unbelievable for someone who has not been following how the events unfolded. For those who haven’t been following it or have been ignoring her statements, they might ask, does Robredo deserve it? My unbiased and non-partisan opinion says she does.
If we do a flashback from two weeks ago, it was easy to see Robredo was walking into a trap of her own making. She told the media that Duterte’s drug war has failed. Mind you, she didn’t even have any data or facts to back her claim. Of course Duterte got pissed off. He offered her a post as “drug czar” – to give her a chance to prove she can do a better job. After all, she’s been acting like she knows better than everyone. Against the advice of her party-mates and supporters, Robredo accepted the offer. She was pumped up about it. She even had the gall to ask if everyone was ready for her.
Unfortunately, she started to unravel from Day One on the job. Robredo started asking irrelevant questions like how many drug addicts are in the country. As if drug addicts would readily admit they are drug addicts. She was also suggesting that there should be zero deaths in the drug war. That was too naïve and unrealistic. Members of illegal drug syndicates are among the most dangerous people on Earth. They won’t hesitate to kill anyone who gets in their way. Robrebo was putting policemen’s lives in danger. Her ideas were merely pandering to the so-called “human rights” advocates who seem to care more about the lives of psychopaths and killers than innocent people.
It all went pear-shaped for Robredo after she said she planned to meet with officials from both the United States (US) Embassy and the United Nations (UN) “to discuss issues and possible improvements on the war on drugs”. At first I thought, what the heck is she doing? She was exhibiting that all-too-familiarcolonial mentality. Instead of meeting with member of local agencies tasked to tackle the drug problem, she prioritized asking foreigners for advice. I had a feeling it would piss Duterte off and, as it turns out, it certainly did. He eventually said that Robredo cannot be trusted with sensitive information because she could divulge them to enemies of the state.
Okay, just so no one accuses me of being biased, I also thought it was a bad idea for Duterte to offer Robredo a role in his drug war in the first place because she cannot be trusted and she would be a hindrance to the operation. I knew Duterte was making a mistake because he already advised voters against Robredo and said she would be a nightmare if she becomes President. But I can understand why he had a knee-jerk reaction to her criticism of the drug war.
Now that Duterte fired Robredo, her supporters have listed down all the possible reasons why he did, including one about Duterte supposedly being “scared” of her. Someone even said it’s because she’s a woman. They are delusional. It was obvious that Robredo had nothing on Duterte and has come across as wielding no influence on public perception. The public easily sees through her motherhood statements. Her gender had nothing to do with her getting fired. There are a lot of women in Duterte’s government and they are all doing fine.
Robredo’s supporters should stop lying to themselves. Deep down they knew Leni was going to make a fool of herself which is why they didn’t want her to accept the post. They knew there was a chance she could be exposed as incompetent and un-presidential. Besides, they themselves also asked Duterte to just fire her. Robredo simply did not fit the culture in Duterte’s cabinet. She was not a team player. She was trying too hard to prove that she is better than everyone.
The sooner the Liberal Party and its supporters accept that Robredo is the wrong person to lead them through the next election, the higher the probability of success in the next election.
In the press statements she made after getting fired, Robredo issued veiled threats against the Duterte government and said that she will be publicizing stuff she found out during her stint in the agency. She is setting herself up for another failure. She doesn’t learn. Whatever it is that she is about to expose is not going to hurt a popular President. Duterte has always been vocal and transparent about his policies. This is another attempt at putting the government down just because she got fired.
The more she talks, the more Robredo proves she is vindictive. That is a sign she is not very smart. Her emotional intelligence is low. She can’t control her emotions. She should learn to say less words especially since her words only showcase her true character.
There’s not an ounce of humility in Leni Robredo. She is not capable of introspection. The praises she gets from the inbred cliques of people around her got into her head. Getting fired for the second time should be a humbling experience for her. Unfortunately for her and the Filipino people, she is too arrogant, too full of herself, and too incompetent to get her own agenda going. She will eventually hammer the final nail into the Liberal Party coffin.
About Ilda
In life, things are not always what they seem.
https://www.getrealphilippines.com/2019/11/firing-of-leni-robredo-as-drug-czar-final-nail-on-the-liberal-party-coffin/?fbclid=IwAR3RJZt009XpI2ZAPsAH64IV60nrTDzdUss5sRoZf8APD7tav0wIpl-6JJY
Luke 21:1-4 | The Castell Brothers | Jesus saw a poor widow putting in coins
| ||||||||||||||
|
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)